The destruction and protection of cultural property has been a feature of armed conflicts for thousands of years and it has received increasing international focus over the past two decades. This feature was clearly appeared during the recent armed conflict in Iraq. During the conflict, cultural property was subjected to intentional and organised destruction by members of ISIS. Although there are international legal norms to protect cultural property during armed conflict, however, this destruction has proven the failure of those rules to effectively deter these criminal acts. This Article analyses the framework of international law relevant to the protection of cultural property during of armed conflict in the light of that destruction, and the Article considers whether there are gaps in that framework in relation to the attacks launched by ISIS as a Non-State Armed Group on Iraqi cultural property. By studying recent developments in applicable international law, this Article suggests the need for the international community to announce a third protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention in order to promote international law more effectively and to preserve cultural property for future generations.
This study deals with the topic time of transmission of loose international sales، which is defined by the Vienna Convention on the International Sale of Goods as "passing of risk"
As a basis for "the transfer of liability from the seller's custody to the buyer's guarantee. This expression was adopted by the legislator from the Islamic jurisprudence, which is in an acceptance interview in the real estate legislation. The arrest does not require that the actual possession of the goods has actually been done by the buyer. On the face of the buyer can be caught without a hail, and the Iraqi Trade Law No. 30 Of 1984, the provisions of the Transfer of Liability in International Sale were codified، and its provisions were quoted from
... Show MoreThe children are suffering from many kinds of tragedy acts such as killing and torture which arise from civil wars never be seen along the human history since decades.
We still see millions of children suffering specially in the Arab world, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Yemen. This study deals with kinds of protections which comes by international treaties and practiced by international organizations which helps in the protection through the military conflicts, and we compare this right in the Islamic shree, and how the states are comply with this right and how can they protect the children practically.
At last we reach the conclusion and finally the recommendations.
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forcible removal of ethnic and religious groups from a specific area, with the intent of making the area ethnically homogeneous. Direct deportation is accompanied by genocide, rape, and destruction of property, so the crime of ethnic cleansing can be considered a crime against humanity and can be included in the Genocide Convention.
Ethnic extremism is a concept linked to the use of violence and weapons by a strong party against a weaker party. Extremism and fanaticism are often behind such a crime with the aim of obliterating or concealing the oppressed group in a particular geographical area.
International law has proven that it is an evolving and flexible law over the years, and despite that, this development takes a very long time, as the concept of peremptory norms took 83 years to crystallize and have concrete and impactful applications, and within this development another modern concept emerged, which is the obligations Erga Omnes in the Barcelona Traction case 1970. We have concluded that these two concepts fall under a broader concept, which is peremptory norms, and this concept represents the common supreme interests of the international community, and consists of rules that transcend all other rules in international law, and it is not permissible to derogate or deviate from them. On the other hand, it bears the oblig
... Show MoreThe prevailing pattern of child abduction has changed in the current era, and is no longer limited to the local borders of states but is taking an international turn, and the most accurate legal use of the term international child abduction originates in the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which considers-as the naming of the convention suggests - In cases of kidnapping from the point of view of private international law, the essence of it is a bitter dispute over custody rights that develops to the point of abducting children across borders, to try to obtain custody of the child in another country, so that the snap here is a family member and most often a parent, as it causes many legal consequenc
... Show MoreOur research will highlight the most prominent measures taken by international organizations to address the most prominent effects of armed conflict and genocide that result in large numbers of corpses and the mechanisms for searching human remains and identifying identification.
The international community began to realize, following the discovery of vast wealth in areas that fall outside the territorial limits of states sovereignty, that the huge difference in scientific and technological development between developed and developing countries may give developed countries the opportunity to exploit these wealth, and this, in turn, will lead to a widening gap between countries, developed and developing countries, and the consolidation of the principle of inequality due to the lack of third world countries with the capabilities that allow them to participate in the exploitation of these wealth, and when these concerns came to the fore in the United Nations General Assembly in 1967, Ambassador Arvid Bardo, th
... Show MoreTargeted killings by unmanned aircraft are a dangerous means that threaten the human right to life, both in wartime and in peacetime. In wartime, international humanitarian law prohibits weapons that cannot respect general principles such as discrimination, proportionality and military necessities. In peacetime, all international instruments guaranteeing the protection of human rights prohibit attacks on the right to life, except in cases provided for by law, as well as extrajudicial executions.
The present of a foreign element in the Contract will call the conflict of many laws on the conclude of the contract; usually such conflict will end to the jurisdiction of one law, but in this case it will end to the jurisdiction of many laws on the conclude of the international contract but without being a common jurisdiction, each of the conflicting law will have its own jurisdiction.
Despite the primary role of governments in assuming the primary responsibility in protecting human rights in accordance with international human rights standards and instruments, they are not the only party responsible for ensuring the implementation of those rights. Individuals themselves have a duty towards their society to observe, respect and promote those rights and freedoms and work to protect them by means. All, and this is confirmed by Paragraph (1) of Article (29) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, which states: “Every individual has duties towards the society in which it is only possible for his personality to grow freely and fully. &nbs
... Show More