This work generalizes Park and Jung's results by introducing the concept of generalized permuting 3-derivation on Lie ideal.

Let R be a prime ring and δ a right (σ,τ)-derivation on R. In the present paper we will prove the following results:
First, suppose that R is a prime ring and I a non-zero ideal of R if δ acts as a homomorphism on I then δ=0 on R, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on I then either δ=0 on R or R is commutative.
Second, suppose that R is 2-torsion-free prime ring and J a non-zero Jordan ideal and a subring of R, if δ acts as a homomorphism on J then δ=0 on J, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on J then either δ=0 on J or J
Z(R).

Let M be a prime Γ-ring satisfying abc  abc for all a,b,cM and
,  with center Z, and U be a Lie (Jordan) ideal. A mapping d :M M
is called Γ- centralizing if u d u Z  [ , ( )] for all uU and  .In this paper
, we studied Lie and Jordan ideal in a prime Γ - ring M together with Γ -
centralizing derivations on U.

   The purpose of this paper is to extend some results concerning generalized derivations to generalized semiderivations of 3-prime near rings.

In this paper the centralizing and commuting concerning skew left -derivations and skew left -derivations associated with antiautomorphism on prime and semiprime rings were studied and  the commutativity of Lie ideal under certain conditions were proved.

In this paper, we study the class of prime semimodules and the related concepts, such as the class of  semimodules, the class of Dedekind semidomains, the class of prime semimodules which is invariant subsemimodules of its injective hull, and the compressible semimodules. In order to make the work as complete as possible, we stated, and sometimes proved, some known results related to the above concepts.

In this paper, we proved that if R is a prime ring, U be a nonzero Lie ideal of R , d be a nonzero (?,?)-derivation of R. Then if Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either or U is commutative Also, we assumed that Uis a ring to prove that: (i) If Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (ii) If ad(U)=0 (or d(U)a=0) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (iii) If d is a homomorphism on U such that ad(U) ?Z(R)(or d(U)a?Z(R), then a=0 or U is commutative.

Let R be a 2-torision free prime ring and ?, ?? Aut(R). Furthermore, G: R×R?R is a symmetric generalized (?, ?)-Biderivation associated with a nonzero (?, ?)-Biderivation D. In this paper some certain identities are presented satisfying by the traces of G and D on an ideal of R which forces R to be commutative

It was known that every left (?,?) -derivation is a Jordan left (?,?) – derivation on ?-prime rings but the converse need not be true. In this paper we give conditions to the converse to be true.

The main purpose of this paper is to investigate some results. When h is  -( ,δ) – Derivation on prime Γ-near-ring G and K is a nonzero semi-group ideal of G, then G is commutative .