Let R be an associative ring. The essential purpose of the present paper is to introduce the concept of generalized commuting mapping of R. Let U be a non-empty subset of R, a mapping   : R  R is called a generalized commuting mapping on U if there exist a mapping :R R such that =0, holds for all U. Some results concerning the new concept are presented.

In this paper, we introduce and study the essential and closed fuzzy submodules of a fuzzy module X as a generalization of the notions of essential and closed submodules. We prove many basic properties of both concepts.

Let  be a commutative ring with 1 and  be left unitary  . In this paper we introduced and studied concept of semi-small compressible module (a     is said to be semi-small compressible module if  can be embedded in every nonzero semi-small submodule of . Equivalently,  is  semi-small compressible module if there exists a monomorphism  , ,     is said to be semi-small retractable module if  , for every non-zero  semi-small sub module in . Equivalently,  is semi-small retractable if there exists a homomorphism  whenever  .

    In this paper we introduce and study the concept of semi-small compressible and semi-small retractable s as a generalization of compressible  and retractable  respectively and give some of

In this paper we study the concepts of copure submodules and coregular
modules. Many results related with these concepts are obtained.

In this paper we study necessary and sufficient conditions for a reverse- centralizer of a semiprime ring R to be orthogonal. We also prove that a reverse- centralizer T of a semiprime ring R having a commuting generalized inverse is orthogonal

The purpose of this paper is to prove the following result: Let R be a 2-torsion free ring and T: R?R an additive mapping such that T is left (right) Jordan ?-centralizers on R. Then T is a left (right) ?-centralizer of R, if one of the following conditions hold (i) R is a semiprime ring has a commutator which is not a zero divisor . (ii) R is a non commutative prime ring . (iii) R is a commutative semiprime ring, where ? be surjective endomorphism of R . It is also proved that if T(x?y)=T(x)??(y)=?(x)?T(y) for all x, y ? R and ?-centralizers of R coincide under same condition and ?(Z(R)) = Z(R) .

     We introduce in this paper, the notion of a 2-quasì-prime module as a generalization of quasi-prime module, we know that a module E over a ring R is called quasi-prime module, if (0) is quasi-prime submodule. Now, we say that a module E over ring R is a 2-quasi-prime module if (0) is 2-quasi-prime submodule, a proper submodule K of E is 2-quasi-prime submodule if whenever ,  and , then either  or .

Many results about these kinds of modules are obtained and proved, also, we will give a characterization of these kinds of modules.

Let  be a commutative ring with 1 and  be a left unitary . In this paper, the generalizations for the notions of compressible module and  retractable module are given.

An   is termed to be  semi-essentially compressible if   can be embedded in every of a non-zero semi-essential submodules. An  is termed a semi-essentially retractable module, if   for every non-zero semi-essentially submodule of an . Some of their advantages characterizations and examples are given.  We also study the relation between these classes and some other classes of modules.

   In this paper ,we introduce a concept of Max– module as follows: M is called a Max- module if ann N R is a maximal ideal of R, for each non– zero submodule N of M;       In other words, M is a Max– module iff (0) is a *- submodule, where  a proper submodule N of M is called a *- submodule if [ ] : N K R is a maximal ideal of R, for each submodule K contains N properly.       In this paper, some properties and characterizations of max– modules and  *- submodules are given. Also, various basic results a bout Max– modules are considered. Moreover, some relations between max- modules and other types of modules are considered.

Let R be a commutative ring with identity and M be unitary (left) R-module. The principal aim of this paper is to study the relationships between relatively cancellation module and multiplication modules, pure submodules and Noetherian (Artinian) modules.