Let R be associative; ring; with an identity and let D be unitary left R- module; . In this work we present semiannihilator; supplement submodule as a generalization of R-a- supplement submodule, Let U and V be submodules of an R-module D if D=U+V and whenever Y≤ V and D=U+Y, then annY≪R;. We also introduce the the concept of semiannihilator -supplemented ;modules and semiannihilator weak; supplemented modules, and we give some basic properties of this conseptes.
Let R be associative; ring; with an identity and let D be unitary left R- module; . In this work we present semiannihilator; supplement submodule as a generalization of R-a- supplement submodule, Let U and V be submodules of an R-module D if D=U+V and whenever Y≤ V and D=U+Y, then annY≪R;. We also introduce the the concept of semiannihilator -supplemented ;modules and semiannihilator weak; supplemented modules, and we give some basic properties of this conseptes
Let R be associative; ring; with an identity and let D be unitary left R- module; . In this work we present semiannihilator; supplement submodule as a generalization of R-a- supplement submodule, Let U and V be submodules of an R-module D if D=U+V and whenever Y≤ V and D=U+Y, then annY≪R;. We also introduce the the concept of semiannihilator -supplemented ;modules and semiannihilator weak; supplemented modules, and we give some basic properties of this conseptes.
Let R be an associative ring with identity and let M be a unitary left R–module. As a generalization of small submodule , we introduce Jacobson–small submodule (briefly J–small submodule ) . We state the main properties of J–small submodules and supplying examples and remarks for this concept . Several properties of these submodules are given . Also we introduce Jacobson–hollow modules ( briefly J–hollow ) . We give a characterization of J–hollow modules and gives conditions under which the direct sum of J–hollow modules is J–hollow . We define J–supplemented modules and some types of modules that are related to J–supplemented modules and int
... Show MoreIn this note we consider a generalization of the notion of extending modules namely supplement extending modules. And study the relation between extending and supplement extending modules. And some properties of supplement extending. And we proved the direct summand of supplement extending module is supplement extending, and the converse is true when the module is distributive. Also we study when the direct sum of supplement extending modules is supplement extending.
Let M be an R-module, where R is a commutative ring with unity. A submodule N of M is called e-small (denoted by N e  M) if N + K = M, where K e  M implies K = M. We give many properties related with this type of submodules.
Let R be a commutative ring with identity and let M be a unitary left R-module. The purpose of this paper is to investigate some new results (up to our knowledge) on the concept of semi-essential submodules which introduced by Ali S. Mijbass and Nada K. Abdullah, and we make simple changes to the definition relate with the zero submodule, so we say that a submodule N of an R-module M is called semi-essential, if whenever N ∩ P = (0), then P = (0) for each prime submodule P of M. Various properties of semi-essential submodules are considered.
Let be a commutative ring with identity and let be an R-module. We call an R-submodule of as P-essential if for each nonzero prime submodule of and 0 . Also, we call an R-module as P-uniform if every non-zero submodule of is P-essential. We give some properties of P-essential and introduce many properties to P-uniform R-module. Also, we give conditions under which a submodule of a multiplication R-module becomes P-essential. Moreover, various properties of P-essential submodules are considered.
Let be a right module over a ring with identity. The semisecond submodules are studied in this paper. A nonzero submodule of is called semisecond if for each . More information and characterizations about this concept is provided in our work.
Throughout this paper R represents commutative ring with identity and M is a unitary left R-module. The purpose of this paper is to investigate some new results (up to our knowledge) on the concept of weak essential submodules which introduced by Muna A. Ahmed, where a submodule N of an R-module M is called weak essential, if N ? P ? (0) for each nonzero semiprime submodule P of M. In this paper we rewrite this definition in another formula. Some new definitions are introduced and various properties of weak essential submodules are considered.
Throughout this paper R represents commutative ring with identity and M is a unitary left R-module. The purpose of this paper is to investigate some new results (up to our knowledge) on the concept of weak essential submodules which introduced by Muna A. Ahmed, where a submodule N of an R-module M is called weak essential, if N ? P ? (0) for each nonzero semiprime submodule P of M. In this paper we rewrite this definition in another formula. Some new definitions are introduced and various properties of weak essential submodules are considered.