Abstract. This paper examines the structural rules governing abbrevia-tions in the Russian lexicon and proposes methods for translating these abbrevi-ated forms into Arabic. Based on the general theory of abbreviation by Shapovalova (2018) and subsequent typological studies. Abbreviations occupy a significant place in the modern Russian language, especially in official business, scientific and journalistic styles. However, when translating these units into Ara-bic, translators face a number of linguistic and cultural difficulties that require special strategies and adaptation [5, с. 2]. The relevance of this topic is that ab-breviations and acronyms are an integral part of publications / works that require saving printing space. Reasonable use of abbreviations and acronyms also saves the reader's time. Abbreviations and acronyms should correspond to the nature and purpose of the text, be understandable to the reader without decoding or with decoding in the list of abbreviations and be formatted uniformly throughout the publication. The practical significance of the work is that editing and formatting abbreviations and acronyms in a publication / work are the result of an in-depth study of the content of the book text. This requires knowledge of the topic of the work, the rules for compiling and editorial evaluation of abbreviations and acro-nyms used in the publication/work. Practical examples illustrate each method, focusing on readability, cultural acceptability, and referential transparency. The report concludes that a flexible, audience-sensitive combination of these strate-gies ensures both source-accuracy and integration into Arabic language norms. Modern Russian is characterized by a high level of word-formation productivity, including through a variety of word abbreviation techniques. Abbreviations serve the functions of economy of speech means, stylistic marking, terminological ac-curacy, etc. At the same time, translation into Arabic presents linguacultural and formal difficulties: Arabic morphology, phonetics, and graphics react in their own way to reduced forms. The purpose of this paper is to systematize the rules for the formation and use of Russian abbreviations and to develop recommenda- tions for their translation into Arabic. Ключевые
The interactive websites are the interaction between the product and the user, and interactive design is based on the user interface for communication and how the interface responds to the user and how to help him to achieve his goals and enjoy the use of the interface. The interactive design is based on the design of interactive programs, i.e., programs that directly interact with the user, taking into account the different culture of the audience, the age group and many other factors. An example for the use of the user interface: Web designs, smartphone application designs and it even includes computer operating systems and electronic game interface. The interaction is the communication between the source and the receiver. The we
... Show More
Expressions of Gratitude in American English and Iraqi Arabic (). Expressing gratitude is one of the most frequently occurring communicative acts in...
The study aims to identify the effectiveness of a structural theory-based training program in enhancing the teaching practices of Arabic language teachers teaching grade ten in South Al Batinah in Sultanate of Oman. The study used the quasi-experimental design, and the sample consisted of 40 male and female teachers. To achieve the objectives of the study, a training program, an observation form and a measurement tool of teachers’ tendencies towards a structural teaching were made. The program was implemented with an experimental group of 20 female and male teachers in the first semester of the academic year 2018/2019. The study has found that there is a statistically significant difference between the average grades before and after i
... Show More
This paper presents the syntactic dimension of ditransitive verbs in terms of the universal theory of Role and Reference Grammar (RRG). This theory is syntactic in nature, but it also covers the semantic as well as the pragmatic aspects of any linguistic phenomenon. It assumes a universal framework through which syntactic constructions can be analyzed. However, the morphological structure that each language enjoys renders the universal treatment more complicated and can question the universal nature of such a theory. In this paper, an attempt is made to check if the universal tenet of the theory is maintained over two typologically different languages: English and Arabic in respect of the way that double-object constructions (DOCs)
... Show More
(53)
(51)
