Let be a commutative ring with identity , and be a unitary (left) R-module. A proper submodule of is said to be quasi- small prime submodule , if whenever with and , then either or . In this paper ,we give a comprehensive study of quasi- small prime submodules.
Let R be a commutative ring with identity and let M be a unital left Rmodule.
Goodearl introduced the following concept :A submodule A of an R –
module M is an y – closed submodule of M if is nonsingular.In this paper we
introduced an y – closed injective modules andchain condition on y – closed
submodules.
he concept of small monoform module was introduced by Hadi and Marhun, where a module U is called small monoform if for each non-zero submodule V of U and for every non-zero homomorphism f ∈ Hom R (V, U), implies that ker f is small submodule of V. In this paper the author dualizes this concept; she calls it co-small monoform module. Many fundamental properties of co-small monoform module are given. Partial characterization of co-small monoform module is established. Also, the author dualizes the concept of small quasi-Dedekind modules which given by Hadi and Ghawi. She show that co-small monoform is contained properly in the class of the dual of small quasi-Dedekind modules. Furthermore, some subclasses of co-small monoform are investiga
... Show MoreLet be a commutative ring with unity and let be a non-zero unitary module. In
this work we present a -small projective module concept as a generalization of small
projective. Also we generalize some properties of small epimorphism to δ-small
epimorphism. We also introduce the notation of δ-small hereditary modules and δ-small
projective covers.
Let R be associative; ring; with an identity and let D be unitary left R- module; . In this work we present semiannihilator; supplement submodule as a generalization of R-a- supplement submodule, Let U and V be submodules of an R-module D if D=U+V and whenever Y≤ V and D=U+Y, then annY≪R;. We also introduce the the concept of semiannihilator -supplemented ;modules and semiannihilator weak; supplemented modules, and we give some basic properties of this conseptes
Let R be associative; ring; with an identity and let D be unitary left R- module; . In this work we present semiannihilator; supplement submodule as a generalization of R-a- supplement submodule, Let U and V be submodules of an R-module D if D=U+V and whenever Y≤ V and D=U+Y, then annY≪R;. We also introduce the the concept of semiannihilator -supplemented ;modules and semiannihilator weak; supplemented modules, and we give some basic properties of this conseptes.
Suppose that F is a reciprocal ring which has a unity and suppose that H is an F-module. We topologize La-Prim(H), the set of all primary La-submodules of H , similar to that for FPrim(F), the spectrum of fuzzy primary ideals of F, and examine the characteristics of this topological space. Particularly, we will research the relation between La-Prim(H) and La-Prim(F/ Ann(H)) and get some results.
In this paper we give many connections between essentially quasi-Dedekind (quasi-
Dedekind) modules and other modules such that Baer modules, retractable modules,
essentially retractable modules, compressible modules and essentially compressible
modules where an R-module M is called essentially quasi-Dedekind (resp. quasi-
Dedekind) if, Hom(M N ,M ) 0 for all N ≤e M (resp. N ≤ M). Equivalently, a
module M is essentially quasi-Dedekind (resp. quasi-Dedekind) if, for each
f End (M) R , Kerf ≤ e M implies f = 0 (resp. f 0 implies ker f 0 ).
Let S be a prime inverse semiring with center Z(S). The aim of this research is to prove some results on the prime inverse semiring with (α, β) – derivation that acts as a homomorphism or as an anti- homomorphism, where α, β are automorphisms on S.
Let R be a prime ring and δ a right (σ,τ)-derivation on R. In the present paper we will prove the following results:
First, suppose that R is a prime ring and I a non-zero ideal of R if δ acts as a homomorphism on I then δ=0 on R, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on I then either δ=0 on R or R is commutative.
Second, suppose that R is 2-torsion-free prime ring and J a non-zero Jordan ideal and a subring of R, if δ acts as a homomorphism on J then δ=0 on J, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on J then either δ=0 on J or J
Z(R).