Let R be a commutative ring with  identity . In this paper  we study  the concepts of  essentially quasi-invertible submodules and essentially  quasi-Dedekind modules  as  a generalization of  quasi-invertible submodules and quasi-Dedekind  modules  . Among the results that we obtain is the following : M  is an essentially  quasi-Dedekind  module if and only if M is aK-nonsingular module,where a module M is K-nonsingular if, for each  , Kerf ≤_e M   implies   f = 0 .

  Let R be a commutative ring with unity. In this paper we introduce and study the concept of strongly essentially quasi-Dedekind module as a generalization of essentially quasiDedekind module. A unitary R-module M is called a strongly essentially quasi-Dedekind module if ( , ) 0 Hom M N M for all semiessential submodules N of M. Where a submodule N  of  an R-module  M  is called semiessential if , 0  pN for all nonzero prime submodules  P of  M .
 

In this research, we introduce a small essentially quasi−Dedekind R-module to generalize the term of an essentially quasi.−Dedekind R-module. We also give some of the basic properties and a number of examples that illustrate these properties.

Let be a ring with 1 and D is a left module over . In this paper, we study the relationship between essentially small quasi-Dedekind modules with scalar and multiplication modules. We show that if D is a scalar small quasi-prime -module, thus D is an essentially small quasi-Dedekind -module. We also show that if D is a faithful multiplication -module, then D is an essentially small prime -module iff is an essentially small quasi-Dedekind ring.

The concept of epiform modules is a dual of the notion of monoform modules. In this work we give some properties of this class of modules. Also, we give conditions under which every hollow (copolyform) module is epiform.

Throughout this paper R represents commutative ring with identity and M is a unitary left R-module. The purpose of this paper is to investigate some new results (up to our knowledge) on the concept of weak essential submodules which introduced by Muna A. Ahmed, where a submodule N of an R-module M is called weak essential, if N ? P ? (0) for each nonzero semiprime submodule P of M. In this paper we rewrite this definition in another formula. Some new definitions are introduced and various properties of weak essential submodules are considered.

Throughout this paper R represents commutative ring with identity and M is a unitary left R-module. The purpose of this paper is to investigate some new results (up to our knowledge) on the concept of weak essential submodules which introduced by Muna A. Ahmed, where a submodule N of an R-module M is called weak essential, if N ? P ? (0) for each nonzero semiprime submodule P of M. In this paper we rewrite this definition in another formula. Some new definitions are introduced and various properties of weak essential submodules are considered.

In this paper, as generalization of second modules we introduce type of modules namely (essentially second modules). A comprehensive study of this class of modules is given, also many results concerned with this type and other related modules presented.

     Let R be a commutative ring with 1 and M be a left unitary R-module. In this paper, we give a generalization for the notions of compressible (retractable) Modules. We study s-essentially compressible (s-essentially retractable). We give some of their advantages, properties, characterizations and examples. We also study the relation between s-essentially compressible   (s-essentially retractable modules) and some classes of modules.

Let R be a ring with 1 and W is a left Module over R. A Submodule D of an R-Module W is small in W(D ≪ W) if whenever a Submodule V of W s.t W = D + V then V = W. A proper Submodule Y of an R-Module W is semismall in W(Y ≪_S W) if Y = 0 or Y/F ≪ W/F ∀ nonzero Submodules F of Y. A Submodule U of an R-Module E is essentially semismall(U ≪es E), if for every non zero semismall Submodule V of E, V∩U ≠ 0. An R-Module E is essentially semismall quasi-Dedekind(ESSQD) if Hom(E/W, E) = 0 ∀ W ≪es E. A ring R is ESSQD if R is an ESSQD R-Module. An R-Module E is a scalar R-Module if, ∀ , ∃ s.t V(e) = ze ∀ . In this paper, we study the relationship between ESSQD Modules with scalar and multiplication Modules. We show that