In this paper, we introduce the concept of e-small M-Projective modules as a generalization of M-Projective modules.
In this paper, we introduce a new concept named St-polyform modules, and show that the class of St-polyform modules is contained properly in the well-known classes; polyform, strongly essentially quasi-Dedekind and ?-nonsingular modules. Various properties of such modules are obtained. Another characterization of St-polyform module is given. An existence of St-polyform submodules in certain class of modules is considered. The relationships of St-polyform with some related concepts are investigated. Furthermore, we introduce other new classes which are; St-semisimple and ?-non St-singular modules, and we verify that the class of St-polyform modules lies between them.
The concept of St-Polyform modules, was introduced and studied by Ahmed in [1], where a module M is called St-polyform, if for every submodule N of M and for any homomorphism ð‘“:N M; kerð‘“ is St-closed submodule in N. The novelty of this paper is to dualize this class of modules, the authors call it CSt-polyform modules, and according to this dualizations, some results which appeared in [1] are dualized for example we prove that in the class of hollow modules, every CSt-polyform module is coquasi-Dedekind. In addition, several important properties of CSt-polyform module are established, and other characterization of CSt-polyform is given. Moreover, many relationships of CSt-polyform modules with other related concepts are
... Show MoreAn R-module M is called rationally extending if each submodule of M is rational in a direct summand of M. In this paper we study this class of modules which is contained in the class of extending modules, Also we consider the class of strongly quasi-monoform modules, an R-module M is called strongly quasi-monoform if every nonzero proper submodule of M is quasi-invertible relative to some direct summand of M. Conditions are investigated to identify between these classes. Several properties are considered for such modules
Gangyong Lee, S. Tariq Rizvi, and Cosmin S. Roman studied Dual Rickart modules. The main purpose of this paper is to define strong dual Rickart module. Let M and N be R- modules , M is called N- strong dual Rickart module (or relatively sd-Rickart to N)which is denoted by M it is N-sd- Rickart if for every submodule A of M and every homomorphism fHom (M , N) , f (A) is a direct summand of N. We prove that for an R- module M , if R is M-sd- Rickart , then every cyclic submodule of M is a direct summand . In particular, if M<
... Show MoreLet M be a R-module, where R be a commutative ring with identity, In this paper, we defined a new kind of module namely ET-hollow lifting module, Let T be a submodule of M, M is called ET-hollow lifting module if for every sub-module H of M with
The purpose of this work is to study the classification and construction of (k,3)-arcs in the projective plane PG(2,7). We found that there are two (5,3)-arcs, four (6,3)-arcs, six (7,3)arcs, six (8,3)-arcs, seven (9,3)-arcs, six (10,3)-arcs and six (11,3)-arcs. All of these arcs are incomplete. The number of distinct (12,3)-arcs are six, two of them are complete. There are four distinct (13,3)-arcs, two of them are complete and one (14,3)-arc which is incomplete. There exists one complete (15,3)-arc.
In a previous work, Ali and Ghawi studied closed Rickart modules. The main purpose of this paper is to define and study the properties of y-closed Rickart modules .We prove that, Let and be two -modules such that is singular. Then is -y-closed Rickart module if and only if Also, we study the direct sum of y-closed Rickart modules.
In this work, we construct and classify the projectively distinct (k,3)-arcs in PG(2,9), where k ≥ 5, and prove that the complete (k,3)-arcs do not exist, where 5 ≤ k ≤ 13. We found that the maximum complete (k,3)-arc in PG(2,q) is the (16,3)-arc and the minimum complete (k,3)-arc in PG(2,q) is the (14,3)-arc. Moreover, we found the complete (k,3)-arcs between them.
Let R be a commutative ring with identity, and let M be a unitary (left) R- modul e. The ideal annRM = {r E R;rm = 0 V mE M} plays a central
role in our work. In fact, we shall be concemed with the case where annR1i1 = annR(x) for some x EM such modules will be called bounded modules.[t htrns out that there are many classes of modules properly contained in the class of bounded modules such as cyclic modules, torsion -G·ee modulcs,faithful multiplicat
... Show More