In this paper, we introduce the concept of e-small Projective modules as a generlization of Projective modules.

The main goal of this paper is to introduce a new class in the category of modules. It is called quasi-invertibility monoform (briefly QI-monoform) modules. This class of modules is a generalization of monoform modules. Various properties and another characterization of QI-monoform modules are investigated. So, we prove that an R-module M is QI-monoform if and only if for each non-zero homomorphism f:M E(M), the kernel of this homomorphism is not quasi-invertible submodule of M. Moreover, the cases under which the QI-monoform module can be monoform are discussed. The relationships between QI-monoform and other related concepts such as semisimple, injective and multiplication modules are studied. We also show that they are proper subclass

An R-module M is called a 2-regular module if every submodule N of M is 2-pure submodule, where a submodule N of M is 2-pure in M if for every ideal I of R, I2MN = I2N, [1]. This paper is a continuation of [1]. We give some conditions to characterize this class of modules, also many relationships with other related concepts are introduced.

    Throughout this work we introduce the notion of Annihilator-closed submodules, and we give some basic properties of this concept. We also introduce a generalization for the Extending modules, namely Annihilator-extending modules. Some fundamental properties are presented as well as  we discuss the relation between this concept and some other related concepts.

We introduce in this paper the concept of an approximately pure submodule as a     generalization of a pure submodule, that is defined by Anderson and Fuller. If every submodule of an R-module  is approximately pure, then  is called F-approximately regular. Further, many results about this concept are given.

     Let R be an associative ring. The essential purpose of the present paper is to introduce the concept of generalized commuting mapping of R. Let U be a non-empty subset of R, a mapping   : R  R is called a generalized commuting mapping on U if there exist a mapping :R R such that =0, holds for all U. Some results concerning the new concept are presented.

Let R be a commutative ring with identity, and let M be a unitary (left) R- modul e. The ideal annRM  = {r E R;rm  = 0 V  mE M} plays a central

role  in  our  work.  In  fact,  we  shall  be  concemed   with  the  case  where annR1i1 = annR(x) for   some   x EM such  modules  will  be  called bounded  modules.[t  htrns out that there are many classes of modules properly contained in the class of bounded modules such as cyclic modules, torsion -G·ee modulcs,faithful  multiplicat

Let R be a commutative ring with unity. Let W be an R-module, for K≤F, where F is a submodule of W and K is said to be R-annihilator coessential submodule of F in W (briefly R-a-coessential) if  (denoted by K  F in W). An R-module W is called strongly hollow -R-annihilator -lifting module (briefly, strongly hollow-R-a-lifting), if for every submodule F of W with  hollow, there exists a fully invariant direct summand K of W such that K  F in W. An R - module W is called strongly R - annihilator - ( hollow - lifting ) module ( briefly strongly R - a - ( hollow - lifting ) module ), if for every submodule F of W with   R - a - hollow, there exists a fully invariant direct summand K o

Let  be a commutative ring with an identity and be a unitary -module. We say that a non-zero submodule  of  is  primary if for each with en either or  and an -module  is a small primary if   =  for each proper submodule  small in. We provided and demonstrated some of the characterizations and features of these types of submodules (modules).  

Let R be a prime ring and δ a right (σ,τ)-derivation on R. In the present paper we will prove the following results:
First, suppose that R is a prime ring and I a non-zero ideal of R if δ acts as a homomorphism on I then δ=0 on R, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on I then either δ=0 on R or R is commutative.
Second, suppose that R is 2-torsion-free prime ring and J a non-zero Jordan ideal and a subring of R, if δ acts as a homomorphism on J then δ=0 on J, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on J then either δ=0 on J or J
Z(R).