The purpose of this paper is to prove the following result: Let R be a 2-torsion free ring and T: R?R an additive mapping such that T is left (right) Jordan ?-centralizers on R. Then T is a left (right) ?-centralizer of R, if one of the following conditions hold (i) R is a semiprime ring has a commutator which is not a zero divisor . (ii) R is a non commutative prime ring . (iii) R is a commutative semiprime ring, where ? be surjective endomorphism of R . It is also proved that if T(x?y)=T(x)??(y)=?(x)?T(y) for all x, y ? R and ?-centralizers of R coincide under same condition and ?(Z(R)) = Z(R) .
In this paper a Г-ring M is presented. We will study the concept of orthogonal generalized symmetric higher bi-derivations on Г-ring. We prove that if M is a 2-torsion free semiprime Г-ring , and are orthogonal generalized symmetric higher bi-derivations associated with symmetric higher bi-derivations respectively for all n ϵN.
The main purpose of this paper is to show that zero symmetric prime near-rings, satisfying certain identities on n-derivations, are commutative rings.
In this paper, we investigate prime near – rings with two sided α-n-derivations
satisfying certain differential identities. Consequently, some well-known results
have been generalized. Moreover, an example proving the necessity of the primness
hypothesis is given.
In this study, we prove that let N be a fixed positive integer and R be a semiprime -ring with extended centroid . Suppose that additive maps such that is onto, satisfy one of the following conditions belong to Г-N- generalized strong commutativity preserving for short; (Γ-N-GSCP) on R belong to Г-N-anti-generalized strong commutativity preserving for short; (Γ-N-AGSCP) Then there exists an element and additive maps such that is of the form and when condition (i) is satisfied, and when condition (ii) is satisfied
The definition of orthogonal generalized higher k-derivation is examined in this paper and we introduced some of its related results.
In this paper, we proved that if R is a prime ring, U be a nonzero Lie ideal of R , d be a nonzero (?,?)-derivation of R. Then if Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either or U is commutative Also, we assumed that Uis a ring to prove that: (i) If Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (ii) If ad(U)=0 (or d(U)a=0) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (iii) If d is a homomorphism on U such that ad(U) ?Z(R)(or d(U)a?Z(R), then a=0 or U is commutative.
The purpose of this paper is to extend some results concerning generalized derivations to generalized semiderivations of 3-prime near rings.
The main purpose of this paper is to define generalized Γ-n-derivation, study and investigate some results of generalized Γ-n-derivation on prime Γ-near-ring G and
Let R be a 2-torision free prime ring and ?, ?? Aut(R). Furthermore, G: R×R?R is a symmetric generalized (?, ?)-Biderivation associated with a nonzero (?, ?)-Biderivation D. In this paper some certain identities are presented satisfying by the traces of G and D on an ideal of R which forces R to be commutative
Let be a prime ring, be a non-zero ideal of and be automorphism on. A mapping is called a multiplicative (generalized) reverse derivation if where is any map (not necessarily additive). In this paper, we proved the commutativity of a prime ring R admitting a multiplicative (generalized) reverse derivation satisfying any one of the properties:
for all x, y