Let R be a commutative ring with 1 and M be a left unitary R-module. In this paper, we give a generalization for the notions of compressible (retractable) Modules. We study s-essentially compressible (s-essentially retractable). We give some of their advantages, properties, characterizations and examples. We also study the relation between s-essentially compressible (s-essentially retractable modules) and some classes of modules.
Let be a commutative ring with 1 and be left unitary . In this papers we introduced and studied concept P-small compressible (An is said to be P-small compressible if can be embedded in every of it is nonzero P-small submodule of . Equivalently, is P-small compressible if there exists a monomorphism , , is said to be P-small retractable if , for every non-zero P-small submodule of . Equivalently, is P-small retractable if there exists a homomorphism whenever as a generalization of compressible and retractable respectively and give some of their advantages characterizations and examples.
Let be a ring with 1 and D is a left module over . In this paper, we study the relationship between essentially small quasi-Dedekind modules with scalar and multiplication modules. We show that if D is a scalar small quasi-prime -module, thus D is an essentially small quasi-Dedekind -module. We also show that if D is a faithful multiplication -module, then D is an essentially small prime -module iff is an essentially small quasi-Dedekind ring.
In this paper we give many connections between essentially quasi-Dedekind (quasi-
Dedekind) modules and other modules such that Baer modules, retractable modules,
essentially retractable modules, compressible modules and essentially compressible
modules where an R-module M is called essentially quasi-Dedekind (resp. quasi-
Dedekind) if, Hom(M N ,M ) 0 for all N ≤e M (resp. N ≤ M). Equivalently, a
module M is essentially quasi-Dedekind (resp. quasi-Dedekind) if, for each
f End (M) R , Kerf ≤ e M implies f = 0 (resp. f 0 implies ker f 0 ).
Let R be a ring with 1 and W is a left Module over R. A Submodule D of an R-Module W is small in W(D ≪ W) if whenever a Submodule V of W s.t W = D + V then V = W. A proper Submodule Y of an R-Module W is semismall in W(Y ≪_S W) if Y = 0 or Y/F ≪ W/F ∀ nonzero Submodules F of Y. A Submodule U of an R-Module E is essentially semismall(U ≪es E), if for every non zero semismall Submodule V of E, V∩U ≠ 0. An R-Module E is essentially semismall quasi-Dedekind(ESSQD) if Hom(E/W, E) = 0 ∀ W ≪es E. A ring R is ESSQD if R is an ESSQD R-Module. An R-Module E is a scalar R-Module if, ∀ , ∃ s.t V(e) = ze ∀ . In this paper, we study the relationship between ESSQD Modules with scalar and multiplication Modules. We show that
... Show MoreIn this paper, we introduce a type of modules, namely S-K-nonsingular modules, which is a generalization of K-nonsingular modules. A comprehensive study of these classes of modules is given.
The -s-extending modules will be purpose of this paper, a module M is -s-extending if each submodule in M is essential in submodule has a supplement that is direct summand. Initially, we give relation between this concept with weakly supplement extending modules and -supplemented modules. In fact, we gives the following implications:
Lifting modules -supplemented modules -s-extending modules weakly supplement extending modules.
It is also we give examples show that, the converse of this result is not true. Moreover, we study when the converse of this result is true.
The main goal of this paper is to introduce and study a new concept named d*-supplemented which can be considered as a generalization of W- supplemented modules and d-hollow module. Also, we introduce a d*-supplement submodule. Many relationships of d*-supplemented modules are studied. Especially, we give characterizations of d*-supplemented modules and relationship between this kind of modules and other kind modules for example every d-hollow (d-local) module is d*-supplemented and by an example we show that the converse is not true.
Let L be a commutative ring with identity and let W be a unitary left L- module. A submodule D of an L- module W is called s- closed submodule denoted by D ≤sc W, if D has no proper s- essential extension in W, that is , whenever D ≤ W such that D ≤se H≤ W, then D = H. In this paper, we study modules which satisfies the ascending chain conditions (ACC) and descending chain conditions (DCC) on this kind of submodules.
In this paper, we introduce and study the concept of S-coprime submodules, where a proper submodule N of an R-module M is called S-coprime submodule if M N is S-coprime Rmodule. Many properties about this concept are investigated.
Throughout this paper R represents a commutative ring with identity and all R-modules M are unitary left R-modules. In this work we introduce the notion of S-maximal submodules as a generalization of the class of maximal submodules, where a proper submodule N of an R-module M is called S-maximal, if whenever W is a semi essential submodule of M with N ⊊ W ⊆ M, implies that W = M. Various properties of an S-maximal submodule are considered, and we investigate some relationships between S-maximal submodules and some others related concepts such as almost maximal submodules and semimaximal submodules. Also, we study the behavior of S-maximal submodules in the class of multiplication modules. Farther more we give S-Jacobson radical of rings
... Show More