In modules there is a relation between supplemented and Ï€-projective semimodules. This relation was introduced, explained and investigated by many authors. This research will firstly introduce a concept of "supplement subsemimodule" analogues to the case in modules: a subsemimodule Y of a semimodule W is said to be supplement of  a subsemimodule X if it is minimal with the property X+Y=W. A subsemimodule Y is called a supplement subsemimodule if it is a supplement of some subsemimodule of W. Then, the concept of supplemented semimodule will be defined as follows: an S-semimodule W is said to be supplemented if every subsemimodule of W is a supplemen

In this paper, we introduce and study a new concept named couniform modules, which is a dual notion of uniform modules, where an R-module M is said to be couniform if every proper submodule N of M is either zero or there exists a proper submodule N1 of N such that is small submodule of Also many relationships are given between this class of modules and other related classes of modules. Finally, we consider the hereditary property between R-module M and R-module R in case M is couniform.

In this paper we introduce and study a new concept named couniform modules, which is a dual notion of uniform modules, where an R-module M is said to be couniform if every proper submodule N of M is either zero or there exists a proper submodule N1 of N such that is small submodule of (denoted by ) Also many relationships are given between this class of modules and other related classes of modules. Finally, we consider the hereditary property between R-module M and R-module R in case M is couniform.

In this note we consider a generalization of the notion of a purely extending
modules, defined using y– closed submodules.
We show that a ring R is purely y – extending if and only if every cyclic nonsingular
R – module is flat. In particular every nonsingular purely y extending ring is
principal flat.

     Let  be an R-module, and let  be a submodule of . A submodule  is called -Small submodule () if for every submodule  of  such that  implies that . In our work we give the definition of -coclosed submodule and -hollow-lifiting modules with many properties.

MDS code is a linear code that achieves equality in the Singleton bound, and projective MDS (PG-MDS) is MDS code with independents property of any two columns of its generator matrix.   In this paper, elementary methods for modifying a PG-MDS code of dimensions 2, 3, as extending and lengthening, in order to find new incomplete PG-MDS codes have been used over . Also, two complete PG-MDS codes over  of length  and 28 have been found.

        The purpose of this paper is to give the definition of projective 3-space PG(3,q) over Galois field GF(q), q = p^m for some prime number p and some integer m.

        Also, the definition of the plane in PG(3,q) is given and state the principle of duality.

        Moreover some theorems in PG(3,q) are proved.

In projective plane over a finite field q F , a conic is the unique complete
(q 1) arc and any arcs on a conic are incomplete arc of degree less than q 1.
These arcs correspond to sets in the projective line over the same field. In this paper,
The number of inequivalent incomplete k  arcs; k  5,6, ,12, on the conic in
PG(2,23) and stabilizer group types are found. Also, the projective line
PG(1,23) has been splitting into two 12-sets and partitioned into six disjoint
tetrads.

      Let A, and N  are a semiring ,and  a left A- semimodule, respectively. In this work we will discuss two cases: 

1. The direct summand of π-projective semi module is π-projective, while the direct sum of two π-projective semimodules in general is not π-projective . The details of the proof will be given.
2. We will give a condition under which the direct sum of two π-projective semi modules is π-projective, as well as we also set conditions under which π-projective semi modules are projective.