MDS code is a linear code that achieves equality in the Singleton bound, and projective MDS (PG-MDS) is MDS code with independents property of any two columns of its generator matrix. In this paper, elementary methods for modifying a PG-MDS code of dimensions 2, 3, as extending and lengthening, in order to find new incomplete PG-MDS codes have been used over . Also, two complete PG-MDS codes over of length and 28 have been found.
This research is concerned with the study of the projective plane over a finite field . The main purpose is finding partitions of the projective line PG( ) and the projective plane PG( ) , in addition to embedding PG(1, ) into PG( ) and PG( ) into PG( ). Clearly, the orbits of PG( ) are found, along with the cross-ratio for each orbit. As for PG( ), 13 partitions were found on PG( ) each partition being classified in terms of the degree of its arc, length, its own code, as well as its error correcting. The last main aim is to classify the group actions on PG( ).
The main goal of this paper is to make link between the subjects of projective
geometry, vector space and linear codes. The properties of codes and some examples
are shown. Furthermore, we will give some information about the geometrical
structure of the arcs. All these arcs are give rise to an error-correcting code that
corrects the maximum possible number of errors for its length.
In this paper, we introduce the concept of e-small Projective modules as a generlization of Projective modules.
This paper discusses the problem of decoding codeword in Reed- Muller Codes. We will use the Hadamard matrices as a method to decode codeword in Reed- Muller codes.In addition Reed- Muller Codes are defined and encoding matrices are discussed. Finally, a method of decoding is explained and an example is given to clarify this method, as well as, this method is compared with the classical method which is called Hamming distance.
Let A, and N are a semiring ,and a left A- semimodule, respectively. In this work we will discuss two cases:
- The direct summand of π-projective semi module is π-projective, while the direct sum of two π-projective semimodules in general is not π-projective . The details of the proof will be given.
- We will give a condition under which the direct sum of two π-projective semi modules is π-projective, as well as we also set conditions under which π-projective semi modules are projective.
Let R be a ring and let M be a left R-module. In this paper introduce a small pointwise M-projective module as generalization of small M- projective module, also introduce the notation of small pointwise projective cover and study their basic properties.
.
Let be a commutative ring with unity and let be a non-zero unitary module. In
this work we present a -small projective module concept as a generalization of small
projective. Also we generalize some properties of small epimorphism to δ-small
epimorphism. We also introduce the notation of δ-small hereditary modules and δ-small
projective covers.
In this paper, we introduce the concept of e-small M-Projective modules as a generalization of M-Projective modules.
In modules there is a relation between supplemented and π-projective semimodules. This relation was introduced, explained and investigated by many authors. This research will firstly introduce a concept of "supplement subsemimodule" analogues to the case in modules: a subsemimodule Y of a semimodule W is said to be supplement of a subsemimodule X if it is minimal with the property X+Y=W. A subsemimodule Y is called a supplement subsemimodule if it is a supplement of some subsemimodule of W. Then, the concept of supplemented semimodule will be defined as follows: an S-semimodule W is said to be supplemented if every subsemimodule of W is a supplemen
... Show MoreIn this paper we study the concepts of δ-small M-projective module and δ-small M-pseudo projective Modules as a generalization of M-projective module and M-Pseudo Projective respectively and give some results.