Nilpotency of Centralizers in Prime Rings

In this paper, we investigate prime near – rings with two sided α-n-derivations
satisfying certain differential identities. Consequently, some well-known results
have been generalized. Moreover, an example proving the necessity of the primness
hypothesis is given.

Our active aim in this paper is to prove the following Let Ŕ be a ring having an
idempotent element e(e  0,e 1) . Suppose that R is a subring of Ŕ which
satisfies:
(i) eR  R and Re  R .
(ii) xR  0 implies x  0 .
(iii ) eRx  0 implies x  0( and hence Rx  0 implies x  0) .
(iv) exeR(1 e)  0 implies exe  0 .
If D is a derivable map of R satisfying D(R )  R ;i, j 1,2. ij ij Then D is
additive. This extend Daif's result to the case R need not contain any non-zero
idempotent element.

It was known that every left (?,?) -derivation is a Jordan left (?,?) – derivation on ?-prime rings but the converse need not be true. In this paper we give conditions to the converse to be true.

 The current paper studied the concept of right n-derivation satisfying certified conditions on semigroup ideals of near-rings and some related properties. Interesting results have been reached, the most prominent of which are the following: Let M be a 3-prime left near-ring and A_1,A_2,…,A_n are nonzero semigroup ideals of M, if d is a right n-derivation of M satisfies on of the following conditions,
d(u_1,u_2,…,(u_j,v_j ),…,u_n )=0 ∀ 〖 u〗_1 〖ϵA〗_1 ,u_2 〖ϵA〗_2,…,u_j,v_j ϵ A_j,…,〖u_n ϵA〗_u;
d((u_1,v_1 ),(u_2,v_2 ),…,(u_j,v_j ),…,(u_n,v_n ))=0 ∀u_1,v_1 〖ϵA〗_1,u_2,v_2 〖ϵA〗_2,…,u_j,v_j ϵ A_j,…,〖u_n,v_n ϵA〗_u ;
d((u_1,v_1 ),(u_2,v_2 ),…,(u_j,v_j ),…,(u_n,v_n ))=(u_

The purpose of this paper is to prove the following result: Let R be a 2-torsion free ring and T: R?R an additive mapping such that T is left (right) Jordan ?-centralizers on R. Then T is a left (right) ?-centralizer of R, if one of the following conditions hold (i) R is a semiprime ring has a commutator which is not a zero divisor . (ii) R is a non commutative prime ring . (iii) R is a commutative semiprime ring, where ? be surjective endomorphism of R . It is also proved that if T(x?y)=T(x)??(y)=?(x)?T(y) for all x, y ? R and ?-centralizers of R coincide under same condition and ?(Z(R)) = Z(R) .

In this paper,  we introduce the concepts of  higher reverse left (resp.right)   centralizer, Jordan higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer, and Jordan triple higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer of  G-rings. We prove that every Jordan higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer of a 2-torsion free prime G-ring M is a higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer of  M.

In this paper, new concepts which are called: left derivations and generalized left derivations in nearrings have been defined. Furthermore, the commutativity of the 3-prime near-ring which involves some
algebraic identities on generalized left derivation has been studied.

The main purpose of this work is to generalize Daif's result by introduceing the concept of Jordan (α β permuting 3-derivation on Lie ideal and generalize these result by introducing the concept of generalized Jordan (α β permuting 3-derivation 

In this paper we generalize some of the results due to Bell and Mason on a near-ring N admitting a derivation D , and we will show that the body of evidence on prime near-rings with derivations have the behavior of the ring. Our purpose in this work is to explore further this ring like behavior. Also, we show that under appropriate additional hypothesis a near-ring must be a commutative ring.