The international community began to realize, following the discovery of  vast wealth in areas that fall outside the territorial limits of states sovereignty, that the huge difference in scientific and technological development between developed and developing countries may give developed countries the opportunity to exploit these wealth, and this, in turn, will lead to a widening gap between countries, developed and developing countries, and the consolidation of the principle of inequality due to the lack of third world countries with the capabilities that allow them to participate in the exploitation of these wealth, and when these concerns came to the fore in the United Nations General Assembly in 1967, Ambassador Arvid Bardo, th

        In many countries there are national committees for the implementation of international humanitarian law that aim to advise and assist their governments in implementing international humanitarian law and spreading knowledge about it. The responsibility for the formation of these committees rests with the states, supported by the International Committee of the Red Cross, as one of the ways to ensure the effective implementation of international humanitarian law. The national committees for international humanitarian law seek to urge governments to implement and ensure respect for international humanitarian law and to contribute to its enforcement and dissemination at the national level.

Genocide and crimes against humanity have a distinct meaning in that they are particularly reprehensible attacks that constitute a grave assault on human dignity or constitute a gross humiliation or degradation of the dignity of one or more human beings, and they are not isolated and sporadic incidents.

That the crime of mass graves as a collective genocide is considered a mass murder of a group of people that is carried out on a discriminatory basis with the aim of their total annihilation as a race, people, or a distinct group that is culturally, culturally, linguistically or religiously independent, or for any reason that distinguishes them from humans, and this is what happened with the crime of mass graves in Iraq. We have n

International law has proven that it is an evolving and flexible law over the years, and despite that, this development takes a very long time, as the concept of peremptory norms took 83 years to crystallize and have concrete and impactful applications, and within this development another modern concept emerged, which is the obligations Erga Omnes in the Barcelona Traction case 1970. We have concluded that these two concepts fall under a broader concept, which is peremptory norms, and this concept represents the common supreme interests of the international community, and consists of rules that transcend all other rules in international law, and it is not permissible to derogate or deviate from them. On the other hand, it bears the oblig

The prevailing pattern of child abduction has changed in the current era, and is no longer limited to the local borders of states but is taking an international turn, and the most accurate legal use of the term international child abduction originates in the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which considers-as the naming of the convention suggests - In cases of kidnapping from the point of view of private international law, the essence of it is a bitter dispute over custody rights that develops to the point of abducting children across borders, to try to obtain custody of the child in another country, so that the snap here is a family member and most often a parent, as it causes many legal consequenc

Rules of international humanitarian law establish restrictions on parties to armed conflicts in the their choice of weapons, means and methods of warfare. States when develop or acquire new weapons should verify that it complies with these rules. Current progress by new technology indicates that is very important to continue to assess the legality of new weapons.

That the International Court of Justice is a court of first and last instance, it is a fundamental principle that its rulings are final and cannot be appealed as stipulated in Article 60 of the Statute. Nevertheless, the provision of this Article provides that the States parties to the case may request an interpretation of the decision,  When certain conditions are available, the International Court of Justice has traditionally issued interpretative rulings when the ruling is marred by any ambiguity or ambiguity.  Final determination of judgment and res judicata, in the case of interpretation, if a decision or part of a decision is ambiguous, it may prove impossible for the States Parties to comply with it, and then a request f

The international humanitarian law found the special rules to protect women meanwhile the armed conflicts whether international or non-international. These rules are adopted for woman because of two reasons : that she is from civilians and on the other hand that her special constitution demands a special protection. The international community's attention of women is increased as a result of the tragic situation that faced women around the world especially in the Middle East and particularly in Iraq during the American-British war and ISIS period, these two periods sort many negative effects that reach women such as captivity, slavery, sexual enslavement and rape women especially Yazidis and Christians....

The present of a foreign element in the Contract will call the conflict of many laws on the conclude of the contract; usually such conflict will end to the jurisdiction of one law, but in this case it will end to the jurisdiction of many laws on the conclude of the international contract but without being a common jurisdiction, each of the conflicting law will have its own jurisdiction.

The refugees' issue is the essence of the Palestinian cause as a political, legal and humanitarian one that afflicts every Palestinian, and its repercussions are inherited through generations, because of the suffering, displacement, misery and deprivation that the refugees still suffer. The State of Israel pay a lot of effort to prevent the Palestinians from this right, and is responsible for their plight and displacement because of the racist laws imposed and enacted by it, in addition to the bias of the United States of America alongside Israel in light of the weakness of the international community and the politics of the one pole. This requires the search for alternatives and solutions to enable the Palestinian refugees to exercise t