Let R be commutative Ring , and let T be unitary left .In this paper ,WAPP-quasi prime submodules are introduced as new generalization of Weakly quasi prime submodules , where proper submodule C of an R-module T is called WAPP –quasi prime submodule of T, if whenever 0≠rstϵC, for r, s ϵR , t ϵT, implies that either r tϵ C +soc or s tϵC +soc .Many examples of characterizations and basic properties are given . Furthermore several characterizations of WAPP-quasi prime submodules in the class of multiplication modules are established.
Let R be a commutative ring with 10 and M is a unitary R-module . In this paper , our aim is to continue studying 2-absorbing submodules which are introduced by A.Y. Darani and F. Soheilina . Many new properties and characterizations are given .
In this paper, we present the almost approximately nearly quasi compactly packed (submodules) modules as an application of the almost approximately nearly quasiprime submodule. We give some examples, remarks, and properties of this concept. Also, as the strong form of this concept, we introduce the strongly, almost approximately nearly quasi compactly packed (submodules) modules. Moreover, we present the definitions of almost approximately nearly quasiprime radical submodules and almost approximately nearly quasiprime radical submodules and give some basic properties of these concepts that will be needed in section four of this research. We study these two concepts extensively.
Throughout this paper, we introduce the notion of weak essential F-submodules of F-modules as a generalization of weak essential submodules. Also we study the homomorphic image and inverse image of weak essential F-submodules.
Let R be a commutative ring with unity and let M be a unitary R-module. Let N be a proper submodule of M, N is called a coprime submodule if ï ïŽ is a coprime R-module, where ï ïŽ is a coprime R-module if for any r  R, either O  ï ïŽ ï ïŽ r or  ï ïŽ ï ïŽr . In this paper we study coprime submodules and give many properties related with this concept.
A new generalizations of coretractable modules are introduced where a module is called t-essentially (weakly t-essentially) coretractable if for all proper submodule of , there exists f End( ), f( )=0 and Imf tes (Im f + tes ). Some basic properties are studied and many relationships between these classes and other related one are presented.
In this paper the concepts of weakly (resp., closure, strongly) Perfect Mappings are defined and the important relationships are studied: (a) Comparison between deferent forms of perfect mappings. (b) Relationship between compositions of deferent forms of perfect mappings. (c) Investigate relationships between deferent forms of perfect mappings and their graphs mappings.
Suppose that F is a reciprocal ring which has a unity and suppose that H is an F-module. We topologize La-Prim(H), the set of all primary La-submodules of H , similar to that for FPrim(F), the spectrum of fuzzy primary ideals of F, and examine the characteristics of this topological space. Particularly, we will research the relation between La-Prim(H) and La-Prim(F/ Ann(H)) and get some results.
In this paper, we study a new concept of fuzzy sub-module, called fuzzy socle semi-prime sub-module that is a generalization the concept of semi-prime fuzzy sub-module and fuzzy of approximately semi-prime sub-module in the ordinary sense. This leads us to introduce level property which studies the relation between the ordinary and fuzzy sense of approximately semi-prime sub-module. Also, some of its characteristics and notions such as the intersection, image and external direct sum of fuzzy socle semi-prime sub-modules are introduced. Furthermore, the relation between the fuzzy socle semi-prime sub-module and other types of fuzzy sub-module presented.
The purpose of this paper is to prove the following result: Let R be a 2-torsion free ring and T: R?R an additive mapping such that T is left (right) Jordan ?-centralizers on R. Then T is a left (right) ?-centralizer of R, if one of the following conditions hold (i) R is a semiprime ring has a commutator which is not a zero divisor . (ii) R is a non commutative prime ring . (iii) R is a commutative semiprime ring, where ? be surjective endomorphism of R . It is also proved that if T(x?y)=T(x)??(y)=?(x)?T(y) for all x, y ? R and ?-centralizers of R coincide under same condition and ?(Z(R)) = Z(R) .