Let R be a prime ring and δ a right (σ,τ)-derivation on R. In the present paper we will prove the following results:
First, suppose that R is a prime ring and I a non-zero ideal of R if δ acts as a homomorphism on I then δ=0 on R, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on I then either δ=0 on R or R is commutative.
Second, suppose that R is 2-torsion-free prime ring and J a non-zero Jordan ideal and a subring of R, if δ acts as a homomorphism on J then δ=0 on J, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on J then either δ=0 on J or J
Z(R).
In this paper, the concept of Jordan triple higher -homomorphisms on prime
rings is introduced. A result of Herstein is extended on this concept from the ring into the prime ring . We prove that every Jordan triple higher -homomorphism of ring into prime ring is either triple higher -homomorphism or triple higher -anti-homomorphism of into .
We present the concept of maps Γ- periodi2 on Γ -near-ring S. Our main goal is to research and explore the presence and mapping traits such as h Γ –hom anti-Γ –hom, Γ –α-derivations of Γ -periodi2 on Γ- near-rings.
Let R be an associative ring. The essential purpose of the present paper is to introduce the concept of generalized commuting mapping of R. Let U be a non-empty subset of R, a mapping : R R is called a generalized commuting mapping on U if there exist a mapping :R R such that =0, holds for all U. Some results concerning the new concept are presented.
Let R be a 2-torision free prime ring and ?, ?? Aut(R). Furthermore, G: R×R?R is a symmetric generalized (?, ?)-Biderivation associated with a nonzero (?, ?)-Biderivation D. In this paper some certain identities are presented satisfying by the traces of G and D on an ideal of R which forces R to be commutative
In this paper, we proved that if R is a prime ring, U be a nonzero Lie ideal of R , d be a nonzero (?,?)-derivation of R. Then if Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either or U is commutative Also, we assumed that Uis a ring to prove that: (i) If Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (ii) If ad(U)=0 (or d(U)a=0) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (iii) If d is a homomorphism on U such that ad(U) ?Z(R)(or d(U)a?Z(R), then a=0 or U is commutative.
The main purpose of this paper is to investigate some results. When h is ï‡ -(ï¬ ,δ) – Derivation on prime Γ-near-ring G and K is a nonzero semi-group ideal of G, then G is commutative .
In the current paper, we study the structure of Jordan ideals of a 3-prime near-ring which satisfies some algebraic identities involving left generalized derivations and right centralizers. The limitations imposed in the hypothesis were justified by examples.
In this paper we generalize some of the results due to Bell and Mason on a near-ring N admitting a derivation D , and we will show that the body of evidence on prime near-rings with derivations have the behavior of the ring. Our purpose in this work is to explore further this ring like behavior. Also, we show that under appropriate additional hypothesis a near-ring must be a commutative ring.
Let be a prime ring, be a non-zero ideal of and be automorphism on. A mapping is called a multiplicative (generalized) reverse derivation if where is any map (not necessarily additive). In this paper, we proved the commutativity of a prime ring R admitting a multiplicative (generalized) reverse derivation satisfying any one of the properties:
for all x, y