In this paper we study the concepts of δ-small M-projective module and δ-small M-pseudo projective Modules as a generalization of M-projective module and M-Pseudo Projective respectively and give some results.
Weosay thatotheosubmodules A, B ofoan R-module Moare µ-equivalent , AµB ifoand onlyoif <<µand <<µ. Weoshow thatoµ relationois anoequivalent relationoand hasegood behaviorywith respectyto additionmof submodules, homorphismsr, andydirectusums, weaapplyothese resultsotoointroduced theoclassoof H-µ-supplementedomodules. Weosay thatoa module Mmis H-µ-supplementedomodule ifofor everyosubmodule A of M, thereois a directosummand D ofoM suchothat AµD. Variousoproperties ofothese modulesoarepgiven.
The purpose of this work is to study the classification and construction of (k,3)-arcs in the projective plane PG(2,7). We found that there are two (5,3)-arcs, four (6,3)-arcs, six (7,3)arcs, six (8,3)-arcs, seven (9,3)-arcs, six (10,3)-arcs and six (11,3)-arcs. All of these arcs are incomplete. The number of distinct (12,3)-arcs are six, two of them are complete. There are four distinct (13,3)-arcs, two of them are complete and one (14,3)-arc which is incomplete. There exists one complete (15,3)-arc.
In this paper, we introduce and study the concepts of hollow – J–lifting modules and FI – hollow – J–lifting modules as a proper generalization of both hollow–lifting and J–lifting modules . We call an R–module M as hollow – J – lifting if for every submodule N of M with is hollow, there exists a submodule K of M such that M = K Ḱ and K N in M . Several characterizations and properties of hollow –J–lifting modules are obtained . Modules related to hollow – J–lifting modules are given .
In this paper, we introduce the concepts of Large-lifting and Large-supplemented modules as a generalization of lifting and supplemented modules. We also give some results and properties of this new kind of modules.
Gangyong Lee, S. Tariq Rizvi, and Cosmin S. Roman studied Dual Rickart modules. The main purpose of this paper is to define strong dual Rickart module. Let M and N be R- modules , M is called N- strong dual Rickart module (or relatively sd-Rickart to N)which is denoted by M it is N-sd- Rickart if for every submodule A of M and every homomorphism fHom (M , N) , f (A) is a direct summand of N. We prove that for an R- module M , if R is M-sd- Rickart , then every cyclic submodule of M is a direct summand . In particular, if M<
... Show MoreIn this work, we construct and classify the projectively distinct (k,3)-arcs in PG(2,9), where k ≥ 5, and prove that the complete (k,3)-arcs do not exist, where 5 ≤ k ≤ 13. We found that the maximum complete (k,3)-arc in PG(2,q) is the (16,3)-arc and the minimum complete (k,3)-arc in PG(2,q) is the (14,3)-arc. Moreover, we found the complete (k,3)-arcs between them.
In a previous work, Ali and Ghawi studied closed Rickart modules. The main purpose of this paper is to define and study the properties of y-closed Rickart modules .We prove that, Let and be two -modules such that is singular. Then is -y-closed Rickart module if and only if Also, we study the direct sum of y-closed Rickart modules.
There are two (non-equivalent) generalizations of Von Neuman regular rings to modules; one in the sense of Zelmanowize which is elementwise generalization, and the other in the sense of Fieldhowse. In this work, we introduced and studied the approximately regular modules, as well as many properties and characterizations are considered, also we study the relation between them by using approximately pointwise-projective modules.
The new type of paranormal operators that have been defined in this study on the Hilbert space, is paranormal operators. In this paper we introduce and discuss some properties of this concept such as: the sum and product of two paranormal, the power of paranormal. Further, the relationships between the paranormal operators and other kinds of paranormal operators have been studied.
Let m ≥ 1,n ≥ 1 be fixed integers and let R be a prime ring with char (R) ≠2 and
(m+n). Let T be a (m,n)(U,R)-Centralizer where U is a Jordan ideal of R and T(R)
⊆ Z(R) where Z(R) is the center of R ,then T is (U,R)- Centralizer.