In this paper, we proved that if R is a prime ring, U be a nonzero Lie ideal of R , d be a nonzero (?,?)-derivation of R. Then if Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either or U is commutative Also, we assumed that Uis a ring to prove that: (i) If Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (ii) If ad(U)=0 (or d(U)a=0) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (iii) If d is a homomorphism on U such that ad(U) ?Z(R)(or d(U)a?Z(R), then a=0 or U is commutative.
Nilpotency of Centralizers in Prime Rings
In this paper, we investigate prime near – rings with two sided α-n-derivations
satisfying certain differential identities. Consequently, some well-known results
have been generalized. Moreover, an example proving the necessity of the primness
hypothesis is given.
The main purpose of this paper is to show that zero symmetric prime near-rings, satisfying certain identities on n-derivations, are commutative rings.
Let R be an associative ring. The essential purpose of the present paper is to introduce the concept of generalized commuting mapping of R. Let U be a non-empty subset of R, a mapping : R R is called a generalized commuting mapping on U if there exist a mapping :R R such that =0, holds for all U. Some results concerning the new concept are presented.
The definition of orthogonal generalized higher k-derivation is examined in this paper and we introduced some of its related results.
The main purpose of this work is to generalize Daif's result by introduceing the concept of Jordan (α β permuting 3-derivation on Lie ideal and generalize these result by introducing the concept of generalized Jordan (α β permuting 3-derivation
This work generalizes Park and Jung's results by introducing the concept of generalized permuting 3-derivation on Lie ideal.
It was known that every left (?,?) -derivation is a Jordan left (?,?) – derivation on ?-prime rings but the converse need not be true. In this paper we give conditions to the converse to be true.
The purpose of this paper is to prove the following result: Let R be a 2-torsion free ring and T: R?R an additive mapping such that T is left (right) Jordan ?-centralizers on R. Then T is a left (right) ?-centralizer of R, if one of the following conditions hold (i) R is a semiprime ring has a commutator which is not a zero divisor . (ii) R is a non commutative prime ring . (iii) R is a commutative semiprime ring, where ? be surjective endomorphism of R . It is also proved that if T(x?y)=T(x)??(y)=?(x)?T(y) for all x, y ? R and ?-centralizers of R coincide under same condition and ?(Z(R)) = Z(R) .
In this paper, we introduce the notion of Jordan generalized Derivation on prime and then some related concepts are discussed. We also verify that every Jordan generalized Derivation is generalized Derivation when is a 2-torsionfree prime .