There are Islamic sources and books that deal with the different doctrinal and differential framework of the Islamic religion with a monistic approach, describing them with embarrassing jurisprudential titles such as: excommunication and expiation, and epithets that carry the characteristics of hatred and rejection, in addition to removing them from the sect and religion, and the reason for that is that the doctrine (A) or (b) considers itself the doctrine that represents only the Islamic religion, and other doctrines are misguided and disbelieving. the reasons behind this - besides the attempt to establish doctrinal and fiqih rooting in claiming truth and escaping from within the foundational differential doctrinal system – is the political aspect which has had and is still a great influence on the rise of the trend of modeling In the Arab and Islamic world since the inception of sects; where the political authority and circles supporting them have become sectarian biased. The authority believes that it provides it with advocacy in the face of its opponents from other sects, and that this authority provides support to advocates of doctrines and their theorists, which provided an exclusive doctrinal environment consisting of hundreds of sources. Those sources and books within the framework of the Islamic system are the research attempt to diagnose the disease of sectarianism resulting from the monolithic reading of the Islamic religion, and treat it because of its great negative impact on citizenship and peaceful civil coexistence between the people of the same country, and between countries as well, especially since the feature of diversity is prominent in Arab Islamic societies. So, doctrines and teams must re-read each other in a way that provide a permanent climate of coexistence unaffected by the concerned political aspects.
