Praise be to God, Lord of the worlds, and prayers and peace be upon our master and beloved Muhammad, the wise guide and great teacher, the guide to a straight path, the one sent as a mercy to the worlds, and upon his good and chosen family, his chosen companions, the working scholars, and those who follow them in righteousness until the Day of Judgment.
And after:
One of the important controversial topics shared between the sciences of the Noble Hadith and the Fundamentals of God is the issue of the innovator in terms of accepting and rejecting his narration and testimony, and the difference in it leads to disagreement in many branches of jurisprudence that were based on texts narrated by innovated narrators or those accused of heresy, so it is up to our honorable scholars to be modern. They were fundamentalists
Jurists in this topic, in order to reach the truth and correctness, and in order to explain these opinions on this issue, I wanted to write on this topic, and show that it is every doctrine and the most correct of them, so this research that is in our hands was tagged (the innovator’s narration
And its impact on the differences of jurists)
I divided my research into an introduction to the definition of heresy and two requirements: The first requirement: I devoted it to explaining the opinions of scholars regarding the innovator’s narration in terms of acceptance and rejection.
He mentioned their evidence and explained the most correct one.
The second requirement: I devoted it to explaining the effect of disagreement in accepting the innovator’s narration regarding disagreement
jurists
