The current research discusses the jurisprudence of the argumentative meaning in the Qur’an, and it is one of the general methods of responses in the Qur’an, as well as the argumentative approach to the recitations of the readers and directing their meanings. I have chosen a model for three verses from Surat Al-An’am, in which there are seven frequent recitations and seven odd ones, on a topic related to theology and faith; It forms the centerpiece of the argument verses in Surat Al-An'am; It contains the jurisprudence of dealing with infidels and dissenters, turning away and forbidding insulting what they claim besides God in the event of corruption, and God Almighty’s decree and wisdom in the occurrence of unbelief with what he celebrates in the tongues, hearts and eyes of the deniers. We need in every age such kind of methods of the Qur’an, especially this era. The importance of this model emerges in the alternation of the two methods of declaring and indoctrination of the argument, and that is the statement of the divine approach in dealing with violators and responding to them as well. And it is a comma in the verses of argument in the entire surah, and after them he said easily: “The word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and justice.” I took the balancing approach to the sayings, the meanings of the recitations and their guidance; and exclude for what may be problems.
The most prominent findings: Proving one of the evidences for the source of the divine Qur’an; Because there is no one in the methods of human argument who decides the argument and teaches it at the same time with such strength and understanding in all respects, this is only in the Qur’an, and the statement of part of the Qur’an’s approach in the method of argument is a report we received. The frequent collection with odd in this abundance is evidence of the circumstances of the descent. I recommended writing a scientific thesis to trace Surat Al-An’am as a whole in this type of method of the Qur’an as a report, rooting and criticism of what contradicted from the methods of human beings in argument; As well as writing in rooting the science of argument and the controversy of the Qur’an from the Qur’an itself and tracing its applications.