International bankruptcy is a legal system for those who take trade as a craft and stop performing their obligations of an international character as a result of a defect in their financial position. Legislative jurisdiction in cases of international bankruptcy is one of the most important topics of international bankruptcy by researching the position of national and comparative legislation by determining the applicable law such as the law of the court that hears the dispute or the law to which the attribution rule refers. 

When exercising their authority in the jurisprudence, judges are subject to a set of restrictions that they must adhere to, as they do not want their jurisprudence to be accepted and welcomed by law practitioners in general, and legal scholars in particular, and in contrast to it, the arrows of criticism and defamation will extend to that jurisprudence, and then they will have to reverse them . Perhaps the most important of those restrictions imposed on judges is their observance of justice between the parties to the lawsuit through their lack of bias for one of the parties at the expense of the other, in addition to their observance of public order and public morals, as well as their observance of the legal texts that they work under its u

This research addresses the commentary on the appeal’s ruling of the Dubai Court of Cassation No. (501) Personal Status law of 2021 issued on 12 January, 2022, which is related to the application of foreign law before the Emirate judge. This ruling raised several legal principles and problems that require clarification and attention due to their importance. This is the first ruling on the application of the legislative amendment introduced by the UAE legislator to Article 1 (3) of the Personal Status Law No. (28) of 2005 by Federal Decree Law No. (29) of 2020. According to thereto, the application of foreign law before the Emirate judge is contingent on the adherence of one of the litigants by applying it in accordance with the attribu

Followers and their followers (may Allah be pleased with them all) followed the approach of the guidance and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah Muhammad (peace be upon him) in the collection and codification of the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad in various Arab and Islamic areas. Subsequent judge Faqih Abu Bakr al-Ansari had a distinct effect during that time immortalized in the pages of our Islamic history in preserving the Sunnah of our great Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and documenting the constants of Sharia and Islamic jurisprudence and its importance in the activity of intellectual and scientific movement in the Arab Islamic State.

يصدر القضاء الدستوري احكامه على وفق اختصاصاته المتعددة ، وأخصها احكامه المعدمة للقوانين المخالفة للدستور ، لذا فإن ذاتية احكامه وصفاتها تمايزت عما سواها من الاحكام القضائية ، وامتازت عليها بخصائص العموم والالزام المطلق والبتات النهائي ؛ من هنا تقايست تلك الاحكام مع القواعد القانونية التي تسن بخصائص العموم والتجريد حتى باتت تنشر بالجريدة الرسمية ذاتها وأصبحت لا تقبل المطاعن التمييزية كونها مقترنة بقرينة

This research aims at identifying the level of Reflective Judgment for University students in term of gender and stage. To this end, the researcher used Khaleel's scale (2016) for the Reflective Judgment. The scale was administered to the sample of the study which is (200) male and female level first-fourth university students. The results have shown that university students are on the level five of the Reflective Judgment, and the first-stage students have reflective judgment more than fourth-stage students. In the light of these results, the researcher has come with a number of recommendations and suggestions.     

The control over discretion rests with the judgment of the judge who issues it. The court, which is competent to hear the appeal of the judgment, shall examine the judgment and examine it for its validity, including all parts of the sentence and its aspects; The tools that the judge works to reach the conclusion he has reached in the judgment, including. However, the court's control, ie, the court of law, is not absolute. In essence, it does not apply to the legal aspect without the factual aspect, and this does not mean that the court does not consider the factual aspect at all. Rather, it does not mean that the court of law does not take the substance of the truth. By the judge to reach the reality and does not specialize in the origin

This paper deals with the most important subject of transaction Fiqh, it is (AL-Dabh )book. this search high lights ruling on eating slaughter source; Scholars were elaborate sacrifices and the conditions they have set for the slayer and the sacrifice and machine of slaughter; and Fatwas contemporary scholars،  scientists and fatwas jurisprudence academies showed the ways that modern slaughter which appeared in our town or in meat exporting meat from Western countries،  to find out the end of the search statement of ruling the meat that do not know the source and do not know how they were slaughtered; The subject acquired its importance to the fact that the slaughter is not the normal things that the human act whatever he wan

The present study aims to explore determinants of entrepreneurial behavior from perspective of social theory. It is based on model notions of (Tyler & Blader, 2003) which have focused on studying role of positively personal and social identity in motivating employees to practicing desired behavior which serves the organization in which they work. Based on these notions and previous literature, study model were built. This model explains the relationship between status judgments (perceived internal respect and perceived external prestige)  and entrepreneurial behavior. It includes three main hypotheses. The first and second hypothesis are concerning the relationship between status judgmen

Praise be to God, who is satisfied with Islam as our religion, “He opened a clear conquest for us,” and whoever works with us through the Shari’ah works and protects us. And that our master and Mawlana Muhammad His servant and Messenger is a prophet who has been merciful and compassionate. "
And after:
The occupation of Iraq and the accompanying bone events, and the following severe obstacles, resulted in a set of problems that require legitimate stances, and satisfactory answers, remove confusion and delusion, amid the clash of opinions and contradictions of jurisprudence. Work and application.
Among the difficult problems that surfaced in light of the new political developments on the land of Iraq: (the ruling on dealing