يتناول البحث الموقف في العراق، وما يتصل بذلك من جرائم دولية مرتكبة

في الأقليم العراقي، ومدى أختصاص المحاكم العراقية الوطنية بنظر تلك الجرائم

ومحاسبة المسؤولين عنها، وبيان أختصاص المحكمة الجنائية الدولية، والدور

الذي يمكن أن تضطلع به في سبيل تحقيق العدالة.

تسلم مكتب المدعي العام ماينيف عن ) 404 ( جهات اتصال تخص الوضع

في العراق وهذه الشكاوى وردت من مواطنين ومنظمات تعبر عن قلقهم حيال

ا

The trial stage is one of the important stages in the criminal case, which aims to assess the weight of the evidence, whether it is in the interest of the accused or against his interest. When the subject court presents the evaluation of the evidence, it presents it in terms of its value in proof. Therefore, the trial procedures guarantee to the litigants, especially the accused, many guarantees, including the right to defense and to express the requests that the legislator allowed them to make, and the judge is not bound by the requests of the litigants. He is free to deny the evidence and is not obligated to include in the reasons for his ruling all the evidence that was presented during the session. Rather, he is only obligated to sta

God has honored the man with life and decent living and warned against attacking anything that violates his sanctity without a legitimate right. Our Islamic Shari'ah has the rights to preserve the right of a Muslim in the event of any harm.

Since I live in a society in which violence has become widespread, and killing among its own people flared up till they began to kill under the excuse of taking shelter, in these pages I would like to explain the status of taking shelter in the light of Islamic Law (Sharia), exploring scholars’ opinions in the legitimacy or illegitimacy of this issue according to the legal standards.
And, to acquaint people, and myself in the first place, with the true nature and the gravity of this issue; to expose it to those who are unaware of it; to remind those who are already aware of it. I would refute the fabrications, remove the suspicions which surround it untill it made the forbidden permissible; the wrong right. I would explain to those

Since the law is the tool for implementing the state’s public policies, it is natural that its provisions (or at least some of them) seek to preserve human dignity as the source on which all rights and freedoms are based. One of the examples of humanizing the provisions of the law in France is what is known as the winter truce. What is this truce, what are the justifications for granting it, what is its historical origin, how did the legislative treatment of it develop, what are the similarities and differences between it and other legal periods included in French law, what is the scope of its application, and what are the effects resulting from it. These questions and others are what we will try to answer through this research.

اذا تم العقد بين الاستشاري وعميله مستكملا لأركانه وشروطه، افاد حكمه، أي الزم طرفيه بالتزامات معينة تجسد هذا الحكم ولا سبيل للتنصل من هذه الالتزامات او تعديلها الا اذا اتفق الطرفان على ذلك، فللعقد قوته الملزمة للطرفين التي تتجسد في جزاء الاخلال به ( المسؤولية العقدية )، وحيث ان القواعد العامة للمسؤولية العقدية ليست من النظام العام، يجوز عندئذ الاتفاق على تعديلها في حدود النظام العام والاداب¹. لذلك وللت

   Discretionary role of the provisions of the Federal Court of Cassation occupies a distinct role in the drafting of the legal base, thanks to vocational and higher professional level, which is practiced by this court in the adaptation of the civil law in light of the changing conditions of the community with the survival of inertia that characterizes the legal basis, so that the legislator important for precision and perfection in his work in drafting this rule, it cannot take in everything and put the necessary solutions to all the new issues that appear in the society. Therefore, the courts in this case is keen to reconcile the provisions of fixed base and the changing conditions of society , in order to reach the intent of

The Court of Cassation is a court of law that monitors the lower courts by reviewing the judgments and decisions issued by these courts, and the fact that their control is on the side of the legal to judge the penal. It monitors the commitment of the courts' compliance with the proper and formal rules of law. In some cases, are errors chop terms and criminal to the facts of the case are subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Cassation and not to the Court of Cassation, except to the extent that they cause the provisions through which the Court of Cassation can impose control over the facts of the criminal case and the outcome of the Court topic The subject of the results, and thus the legal aspect of the criminal case is the place t

Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forcible removal of ethnic and religious groups from a specific area, with the intent of making the area ethnically homogeneous. Direct deportation is accompanied by genocide, rape, and destruction of property, so the crime of ethnic cleansing can be considered a crime against humanity and can be included in the Genocide Convention.

Ethnic extremism is a concept linked to the use of violence and weapons by a strong party against a weaker party. Extremism and fanaticism are often behind such a crime with the aim of obliterating or concealing the oppressed group in a particular geographical area.