Let R be a semiprime ring with center Z(R) and U be a nonzero ideal of R. An additive mappings are called right centralizer if ( ) ( ) and ( ) ( ) holds for all . In the present paper, we introduce the concepts of generalized strong commutativity centralizers preserving and generalized strong cocommutativity preserving centralizers and we prove that R contains a nonzero central ideal if any one of the following conditions holds: (i) ( ) ( ), (ii) [ ( ) ( )] , (iii) [ ( ) ( )] [ ], (iv) ( ) ( ) , (v) ( ) ( ) , (vi) [ ( ) ( )] , (vii) ( ) ( ) ( ), (viii) ( ) ( ) for all .

     Let R be an associative ring. The essential purpose of the present paper is to introduce the concept of generalized commuting mapping of R. Let U be a non-empty subset of R, a mapping   : R  R is called a generalized commuting mapping on U if there exist a mapping :R R such that =0, holds for all U. Some results concerning the new concept are presented.

In this paper a Г-ring M is presented. We will study the concept of orthogonal generalized symmetric higher bi-derivations on Г-ring. We prove that if M is a 2-torsion free semiprime    Г-ring ,  and  are orthogonal generalized symmetric higher bi-derivations  associated with symmetric higher bi-derivations   respectively for all n ϵN.

In this paper,  we introduce the concepts of  higher reverse left (resp.right)   centralizer, Jordan higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer, and Jordan triple higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer of  G-rings. We prove that every Jordan higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer of a 2-torsion free prime G-ring M is a higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer of  M.

Let M be ,-ring and X be ,M-module, Bresar and Vukman studied orthogonal
derivations on semiprime rings. Ashraf and Jamal defined the orthogonal derivations
on -rings M. This research defines and studies the concepts of orthogonal
derivation and orthogonal generalized derivations on ,M -Module X and introduces
the relation between the products of generalized derivations and orthogonality on
,M -module.

In this paper, we will prove the following theorem, Let R be a ring with 1 having
a reverse derivation d ≠ 0 such that, for each x R, either d(x) = 0 or d(x) is
invertible in R, then R must be one of the following: (i) a division ring D, (ii) D 2 ,
the ring of 2×2 matrices over D, (iii) D[x]/(x ) 2
where char D = 2, d (D) = 0 and
d(x) = 1 + ax for some a in the center Z of D. Furthermore, if 2R ≠ 0 then R = D 2 is
possible if and only if D does not contain all quadratic extensions of Z, the center of
D.

this paper, we will prove the following theorem, Let R be a ring with 1 having
a reverse derivation d ≠ 0 such that, for each x R, either d(x) = 0 or d(x) is
invertible in R, then R must be one of the following: (i) a division ring D, (ii) D 2 ,
the ring of 2×2 matrices over D, (iii) D[x]/(x ) 2
where char D = 2, d (D) = 0 and
d(x) = 1 + ax for some a in the center Z of D. Furthermore, if 2R ≠ 0 then R = D 2 is
possible if and only if D does not contain all quadratic extensions of Z, the center of
D.

Let M be a prime Γ-ring satisfying abc  abc for all a,b,cM and
,  with center Z, and U be a Lie (Jordan) ideal. A mapping d :M M
is called Γ- centralizing if u d u Z  [ , ( )] for all uU and  .In this paper
, we studied Lie and Jordan ideal in a prime Γ - ring M together with Γ -
centralizing derivations on U.

In this paper, we proved that if R is a prime ring, U be a nonzero Lie ideal of R , d be a nonzero (?,?)-derivation of R. Then if Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either or U is commutative Also, we assumed that Uis a ring to prove that: (i) If Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (ii) If ad(U)=0 (or d(U)a=0) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (iii) If d is a homomorphism on U such that ad(U) ?Z(R)(or d(U)a?Z(R), then a=0 or U is commutative.