Abstract: Iatrogenic furcal root perforations are serious complications during dental treatment. This study was aimed to compare the sealing ability of new bioceramic root repair material TotalFill® with the other perforation repair materials (GIC, MTA and Biodentine) using a dye- extraction method.Materials and Methods: Forty extracted, human mandibular molars with non-fused well developed root were collected. Artificial perforations were made from the external surface of the teeth. Then the teeth were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n= 10) according to the type of repair material used in this study; Medifil glass ionomercement, TotalFill® bioceramic root repair material, BiodentineTM and MTA Plus. The specimens were then immersed in 4% methylene blue dye up to the CEJ for 48 hours followed by dye extraction with 65% nitric acid for 3 days. The samples were analyzed using ultraviolet (UV) visible spectrophotometer. Data obtained were analyzed using one way ANOVA and Tukey tests at 0.05 significant levels. Results: Statistical analysis showed highly significant differences (P<0. 05) among tested materials. Lower absorption values occurred with TotalFill® group fallowed by biodentine and MTA but higher absorption occurred with GIC group. One Way ANOVA showed highly significant differences (P<0. 05) among the groups. Tukey test showed highly significant differences when compared TotalFill® and Biodentine groups with GIC and significant difference with MTA Plus group, but among TotalFill® , Biodentine and MTA Plus groups the results were non- significant.Conclusion: TotalFill® showed better furcation sealing ability as compared to Biodentine and MTA Plus materials but with no significant differences.