The current research aims at detecting Brain Dominance Learning Styles distinguished
and ordinary secondary school students (males and females).The researcher adopted Torrance
measure, known as ‘the style of your learning and thinking to measure Brain Dominance
Learning Styles’, the codified version of Joseph Qitami (1986); picture (a). The researcher
verified the standard properties of tool. The final application sample was 352 distinguished
and ordinary students; 176 distinguished male and female students and 176 ordinary male and
female students at the scientific fifth level of secondary school from schools in the province of
Baghdad, AL- KarKh Education Directorates in the First and Second . and who have been

Research summary: The current research aims to identify:

1-Mental wandering among university students 2- Attentioncontrol among universitey students. 3- The relationship between mental wandering and attention control among university students. 4- The difference in the relationship among university students: accoerding to a- the gender variable (males - females) b- according to the specialization variable) Scientific-human), and the results of the current research reached the following: 1- University students have mental wandering associated with the task, and mental wandering that is not related to the task. 2- University students have attentive control 3- There is no relationship between mental wandering associated with task and

Abstract

The research aims to measure family negligence and its relationship with internet addiction among university students. The researcher has developed a scale of (20) items to measure the negligence of family, which was applied to (308) male and female university students in the first and fourth stages. The research concluded that University students suffer from family negligence. The research sample has an addiction to the Internet. There is a relationship between family neglect and addiction to the Internet among university students. The researcher came out with a number of suggestions and recommendations.

The study aims to identify the cognitive bias and the level of emotional thinking among university students, besides, identifying the significant differences between male and female students regarding those two variables, and determine if there is a correlation between cognitive bias and emotional thinking. To this end, two scales were adopted to collect needed data: cognitive bias scale designed by (Al-any, 2015), composed of (14) items, and emotional thinking scale designed by (Abdu Allah, 2017), consisted of (27) items. These two scales were administered to (140) students composed the study sample. They were chosen from four different colleges at Al-mustansiriyah University for the academic year (2017-1018). The findings revealed that

One of the important goals in the learning process is to be effective learning through the self-direction of the learner , because it has an impact on the effort of learners , it is better to be a learner responsible for learning and independent of the acquisition of knowledge ,

اذ اكدتكثيرAs many have confirmed منFrom الدراساتStudies والادبياتAnd literature انthat فشلالكثير The failure of many منFrom الطلبةStudents فيin a تنظيمgroup المعلوماتthe information ومعالجتهاAnd processed اثناءduring عمليةProcess تعلمهمLearn them لاNo يرجعReturns الىto me انخفاضdrop فيin a درجةDegree ذكائهمTheir intelligence اوor عدمNo

The research aimed to identify the causal relationship between forgiveness and psychological hardness for university students, by answering the following questions: Does forgiveness cause psychological hardiness? Does psychological hardiness cause forgiveness? Is the relationship between the two variables a reciprocal relationship? The research sample consisted of (300) male and female students from the universities of Baghdad and Al-Mustansiriya University. To extract the psychometric properties of the two scales: forgiveness and psychological hardiness, a sample of (50) male and female students employed to repeat the test, making the six connections between the two research variables. To determine the causal relationship, The Pearson c