Determining risk indicators for dental implants is an essential strategy for preventing peri-implant diseases and effective diagnosis of dental implant success. To investigate the impact of certain potential factors on the osseointegrated dental implant. Eighty-four individuals were included in our study, 50 cases as a patient’s group and 34 participants as a control group. All cases were diagnosed based on certain criteria, 30 (60%) of patients had peri-implantitis, 20 (40%) with severe periimplantitis, 36(72%) were generalized, and 15 (30%) as localized peri-implantitis cases. The study has indicated that 44.7% of dental implants were in the anterior maxilla, followed by (27.3%) posterior maxilla, (17.4%) posterior mandible, and (10.4%) anterior mandible. Also results were showed that the anterior maxilla was significantly the highest (P=0.000) in the incidence of PID than any other implantation sites (PMx, PMa, AMa). The most patients’ complaint was 28(56%) altered gingival appearance, followed by 20(40%) pathological mobility, 16(32%) halitosis, 16(32%) pain, 12(28%) bleeding, 8(16%) unpleasant taste. The majority of the implants in both groups were long, regular-width, conical and had a rough surface In the patient group, all risk indicators related to implant design were showed a significantly higher than the control group, except for regular-width and screw type implant, which were significantly lower than control. In conclusion, the study improved that many different potential risk indicators contributed to the development of PIDs.
In order to serve the field of knowledge in the field of design and analysis of experiments by adopting formulas and methods that are easy and simple in arithmetic work, especially in experiments that require many calculations for squares, including tests of type
