Electrodeposition of metal oxides on graphite electrodes can improve their ability to remove organic substances. In this work, multicomponent oxides of Mn, Co, and Ni were electrochemically deposited on both the anode and cathode of graphite electrodes to enhance their performance in removing phenol. Formation of the deposit was achieved within 2 h in current densities of 20, 25, 30, and 35 mA/cm2 for better composite properties. The deposited layer was characterized by testing the surface structure, morphology, composition, and roughness. X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX), and Atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques facilitated these tests. The composite electrodes have synthesized with a metal salts concentration, i.e., Co(NO3)2, Ni(NO3)2, and MnCl2 of 0.1 M with a mixing ratio of 1:1:1. The results exhibited a remarkable formation of the deposit on both the anode and cathode of our electrochemical cell. An amorphous skin of Mn–Co–Ni oxide was constituted on the anode, while a crystalline film of Mn–Co–Ni oxide accumulated on the cathode. The effectiveness of composite electrodes was examined at current densities of 40, 60, and 80 mA/cm2, pH values of 3, 4 and 5, and NaCl concentration of 1, 1.5, and 2 g/l with an electrolysis time of 1 h. The results show that the removal efficiency of phenol increases with the increase in current densities and NaCl concentration, while it decreases with increasing of alkalinity. The highest removal occurs at the pH, current density and NaCl concentration of 3, 80 mA/cm2, and 2 g/l. The highest obtained removal efficiency is 99.68% which reflects a tremendously high performance of our multicomponent composite for phenol removal and reducing electrolysis time compared to previous studies.
During this research accomplish some chemical modifications on the Poly for new modified polymers with Kimaaaúah qualities, physical and unexpected new applications that the first of these chemical modifications that was completed is the introduction of a poly styrene butadiene swash and then this group
he concept of small monoform module was introduced by Hadi and Marhun, where a module U is called small monoform if for each non-zero submodule V of U and for every non-zero homomorphism f ∈ Hom R (V, U), implies that ker f is small submodule of V. In this paper the author dualizes this concept; she calls it co-small monoform module. Many fundamental properties of co-small monoform module are given. Partial characterization of co-small monoform module is established. Also, the author dualizes the concept of small quasi-Dedekind modules which given by Hadi and Ghawi. She show that co-small monoform is contained properly in the class of the dual of small quasi-Dedekind modules. Furthermore, some subclasses of co-small monoform are investiga
... Show MoreThis work was conducted to study the recovery of catalyst and desirable components from tar formed in phenol production unit and more particularly relates to such a method whereby better recovery of copper salts, phenol, benzoic acid and benzoate salts from tar by aqueous acid solution was accomplished.
The effect of solvent type, solvent concentration (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt%), agitation speed (100, 200, 300 and 400 rpm), agitation time (5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 min), temperature (90, 100, 110, 120, 130 and 140 oC) , phase ratio (1/1, 2/1, 3/1, 4/1 and 5/1) and number of extraction (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) were examined in order to increase the catalyst and desirable components extraction.
Four types of solvent were used; hydrochloric
In this research, we exclude starch indicator preparation,that is used in official phenol assay method. The liberated iodine, in presence of chloroform, was acting as indicator and titrated with sodium thiosulfate until getting a sharp colorless end point. Similarly, starch was cancelled during both blank and standardization of bromine water solution experiments needed in phenol assay. The results obtained were the same volumes and weights as that achieved using starch with just about 0.03% difference in sample procedure. Finally, this work will enable us to save time, effort, fuel and materials spended in laboratory.
Key word:- Phenol, assay, starch indicator
... Show More