Notwithstanding the importance of international cooperation as the other facet of international interactions, a strategy of conflict resolution, a maintainer of international peace and security, its provision in the United Nations conventions, as an objective of the United Nations after the international peace and security, however, the recognition of international cooperation has not been underlined by global, intellectual think tanks. While realism emphasized on the state's role in achieving international cooperation to ensure mutual and multilateral interests, liberalism focused on the role of international organizations in building such cooperation. Additionally, constructivist approaches developed other sub-variables to contribute to the success of the state's attempts at international cooperation strategies, such as identity and social construction of the state.As long as there are conflicting interests, various strengths, different capacities, innovative roles in the world order, nations will keep seeking different patterns of bilateral and multilateral cooperation. Additionally, many countries maintain cooperation with various international representatives to ensure that their interests are realized. Thus, different patterns of cooperation divide nations into cooperative nations, those which maintain contact with international organizations and powers, and non-cooperative nations.There are many non-cooperative countries, particularly those that maintain no contact with the United Nations on several issues. Such non-cooperative countries often cite the rejection of unilateral hegemony over the world order, they are in relevant alliances, or the very nature of these countries' roles in conflicts that underpin them regionally or internationally, as in the case of North Korea. Given these varying patterns of cooperation and alliance, the United Nations, the Security Council, the International Atomic Energy Agency (as an authority in North Korea's nuclear crisis, which poses a direct threat to international peace and security), and the other international actors are obliged to take different techniques of negotiation that vary with respect to phases, talks, and tactics.It is worth mentioning that North Korean nuclear program is a threat to international balances on which East Asia's security, regional stability, and the world order rely. Owing to these considerations, this paper examines international cooperation, draws on theoretical backgrounds to define negotiating strategies, and elaborates on the international tactics taken by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Security Council, the United States of America, Russia, and China to help resolve North Korea's nuclear program.
Strategies for international negotiation with uncooperative countries: North Korea as an example
International cooperation
Realism
Negotiative strategies
North Korean nuclear crisis.
Publication Date
Sat Oct 01 2016
Journal Name
Journal Of Theoretical And Applied Information Technology
Factors affecting global virtual teams’ performance in software projects
Today the trend is to perform software development work via distributed geographical area among team
individual or even as an organization. However
due to the global market and international presence of many companies
there is a need to implement a global virtual teams. The global virtual team members are gradually engaged in globalized business environments across space
time and organizational boundaries via information and communication technologies. A global virtual team relies on communication
collaboration
and information exchange are the most important criteria in global virtual teams’ operations. The purpose of this paper is to answer two research questions. The first research question is to identify the factors affecting global virtual teams’ performance. A systematic literature review was conducted to answer the first research question. The second research question is on what the rank of the factor affecting the global virtual teams’ performance according to their level of effect on global virtual teams’ performance. Online survey was conducted within 103 developers and IT managers from eight IT companies to answer the second research question. The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 22) was used to analyze the collected data. In this study
we investigated factors that affect global virtual teams’ performance
factors considered include cultural differences
language problems
time-zone differences
team size
technical problems
lack of trust
lack of sufficient training
and ICT problems. Also the findings indicated that lack of sufficient training is the highest level of effect on global virtual teams’ performance. On the other hand
team size is the lowest level of effect on global virtual teams’ performance. © 2005 - 2016 JATIT & LLS. All rights reserved.
(23)
