Mixed ligand metal complexes of CrIII, FeIII,II, NiII and CuII have been synthesized using 5-chlorosalicylic acid (5-CSA) as a primary ligand and L-Valine (L-Val) as secondary ligand. The metal complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis, electrical conductance, magnetic susceptibility measurements and spectral studies. The electrical conductance studies of the complexes indicate their electrolytic nature. Magnetic susceptibility measurements revealed paramagnetic nature of the all complexes. Bonding of the metal ion through –OHand –COOgroups of bidentate to the 5-chlorosalicylic acid and through –NH2 and –COOgroups of bidentate to the L-valine by FT-IR studies . The agar diffusion method has been used to study the antib

Mixed ligand metal complexes of CrIII, FeIII,II, NiII and CuII have been synthesized using 5-chlorosalicylic acid (5-CSA) as a primary ligand and L-Valine (L-Val) as secondary ligand. The metal complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis, electrical conductance, magnetic susceptibility measurements and spectral studies. The electrical conductance studies of the complexes indicate their electrolytic nature. Magnetic susceptibility measurements revealed paramagnetic nature of the all complexes. Bonding

Abstract: In this research, nanofibers have been prepared by using an electrospinning method. Three types of polymer (PVA, VC, PMMA) have been used with different concentration. The applied voltage and the gap length were changed. It was observed that VC is the best polymer than the other types of polymers.

In this research, nanofibers have been prepared by using an electrospinning method. Three types of polymer (PVA, VC, PMMA) have been used with different concentration. The applied voltage and the gap length were changed. It was observed that VC is the best polymer than the other types of polymers.

􀀤􀁅􀁖􀁗􀁕􀁄􀁆􀁗􀀑􀀃􀀬􀁑􀀃􀁗􀁋􀁌􀁖􀀃􀁕􀁈􀁖􀁈􀁄􀁕􀁆􀁋􀀏􀀃􀀤􀁊􀀤􀁏􀀔􀀐􀁛􀀬􀁑􀁛􀀶􀁈􀀕􀀃􀀋􀀤􀀤􀀬􀀶􀀌􀀃􀁆􀁒􀁐􀁓􀁒􀁘􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁄􀁏􀁏􀁒􀁜􀁖􀀃􀁓􀁕􀁈􀁓􀁄􀁕􀁈􀁇􀀃􀁉􀁒􀁕􀀃􀁇􀁌􀁉􀁉􀁈􀁕􀁈􀁑􀁗􀀃􀁛􀀃􀀋􀀓􀀑􀀖􀀏􀀃􀀓􀀑􀀙􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀀓􀀑􀀜􀀌􀀃􀁅􀁜􀀃􀁐􀁈􀁏􀁗􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃 􀁗􀁋􀁈􀁐􀀃 􀁌􀁑􀀃 􀁄􀁑􀀃 􀁈􀁙􀁄􀁆􀁘􀁄􀁗􀁈􀁇􀀃 􀁔􀁘􀁄􀁕􀁗􀁝􀀃 􀁗􀁘􀁅􀁈􀀃 􀀋􀀕􀀑􀀘􀀍􀀔􀀓􀀐􀀖􀀃 􀁗􀁒􀁕􀁕􀀌􀀑􀀃 􀀤􀀤􀀬􀀶􀀃 􀁚􀁌􀁗􀁋􀀃 􀁇􀁌􀁉􀁉

The study was aimed to determine the coordinates of  the points were measured by different ways and different instruments, the most precise way using the differential global positioning system (DGPS) that will be the reference measurements in comparison, less precise way using navigator GPS. Google earth (pro.), and the other applications of GPS mobile ( Samsung and I-phone). In this research (8 points) were chosen that are occasional in location. The comparison of the different observations can give us an idea of ​​the extent to which the accuracy of the observations differs from the different devices used in the observing, as well as through the knowledge of the best device and the best way to measure coordinates accurately t