Communication is a vital process that needs much more understanding and mutual background knowledge on the part of ESL learners in terms of grammar, meaning and context. Thus, the main aim of the current research paper is to identify and figure out the denotative and connotative meaning of barnyard verbs in English and practically analyzing these verbs to identify the dictionary meaning from connotative one. The main problem of this study is attributed to the fact that ESL learners may not be able to identify and understand the connotative meaning of barnyard verbs since these verbs are onomatopoeic (i.e,) a word that phonetically imitates, or suggests the source of sound that it describes). Consider the following example: the verb "coo" has a denotative sense in that it refers to the sound of dove or pigeon, but when children "coo", that means they speak gently which is a connotative meaning. Accordingly, the ESL learners may not know the connotative meaning of such verbs because these verbs have different associations and suggestions. The paper falls into four sections. Section one is an introduction which sheds light on the definition and meaning of barnyard verbs. Section two deals with communication. Section three discusses the notion of meaning. Section four is devoted to analyzing the denotative and connotative meaning of barnyard verbs in English. The most important conclusions that the paper has come to can be summarized as follows: firstly, denotative meaning of barnyard verbs has something to do with the use of words whose meaning suggests the onomatopoeic sense, whereas connotative meaning , has something to do with the meaning that is implied by a word a part from the thing which it describes explicitly, secondly, denotatively speaking, barnyard verbs are phonetically described, whereas connotatively speaking , they are semantically described. Consequently, it is somehow easy to figure out denotative meaning of barnyard verbs, but it is hard to identify and understand connotative meaning of these verbs due to the fact that they have different meanings with different contexts.
Denotative and Connotative Meaning of Barnyard Verbs
Barnyard Verbs
Human Communication
Animal Communication
denotative meaning
Connotative meaning
Publication Date
Sat Oct 01 2016
Journal Name
Journal Of Theoretical And Applied Information Technology
Factors affecting global virtual teams’ performance in software projects
Today the trend is to perform software development work via distributed geographical area among team
individual or even as an organization. However
due to the global market and international presence of many companies
there is a need to implement a global virtual teams. The global virtual team members are gradually engaged in globalized business environments across space
time and organizational boundaries via information and communication technologies. A global virtual team relies on communication
collaboration
and information exchange are the most important criteria in global virtual teams’ operations. The purpose of this paper is to answer two research questions. The first research question is to identify the factors affecting global virtual teams’ performance. A systematic literature review was conducted to answer the first research question. The second research question is on what the rank of the factor affecting the global virtual teams’ performance according to their level of effect on global virtual teams’ performance. Online survey was conducted within 103 developers and IT managers from eight IT companies to answer the second research question. The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 22) was used to analyze the collected data. In this study
we investigated factors that affect global virtual teams’ performance
factors considered include cultural differences
language problems
time-zone differences
team size
technical problems
lack of trust
lack of sufficient training
and ICT problems. Also the findings indicated that lack of sufficient training is the highest level of effect on global virtual teams’ performance. On the other hand
team size is the lowest level of effect on global virtual teams’ performance. © 2005 - 2016 JATIT & LLS. All rights reserved.
(22)
