أصدرت المحكمة الاتحادية العليا قرارها المرقم 90/اتحادية/2019 الصادر في 28/4/2021 الذي جاء فيه (لابد للمحكمة الاتحادية العليا من العدول عن قراراتها السابقة بخصوص استحصال موافقة مجلس النواب بشكل مطلق عن أي جريمة يتهم بها أياً من أعضاء مجلس النواب واقتصار ذلك بحالة واحدة فقط وهي (عدم جواز تنفيذ مذكرة القبض الصادرة عن جريمة جناية غير مشهودة متهم بها عضو مجلس النواب خلال مدة الفصل التشريعي او خارجه الا بعد استحصال الاذن

This study is about the subject of exclusion of the application of foreign law as it violates the Islamic Sharia law in terms of Article (27) of the UAE Civil Transactions Law as amended in 2020, which before that date included all disputes involving a foreigner. According to the amendment referred to, the application of Islamic Sharia law shall be limited to civil transactions with the exclusion of personal status affairs.

The study concluded with many results, the most important of which is that the current text of Article (27) of the Civil Transactions Law as amended in 2020 is unable to explain what the judge may do in cases where the foreign law jurisdiction is referred to in one of the excluded texts, namely those related t

العدول عن الاحكام في القضاء الدستوري ظاهرة قضائية مستقرة في معظم المحاكم العليا ، والسبب يرجع الى ما تتمتع به هذه احكام هذه المحاكم من حجية مطلقة ترجع الى كونها غير قابلة للطعن بطرق الطعن القضائية المعروفة على مستوى القضاء العادي ، والمحكمة الاتحادية العليا في رغم حداثة تشكليها نسبياً الى انها اخذت بما انتهى اليه القضاء الدستوري في العالم ومنه الاخذ بمبدأ العدول القضائي استجابة للمتغيرات السياسية والاقتص

يصدر القضاء الدستوري احكامه على وفق اختصاصاته المتعددة ، وأخصها احكامه المعدمة للقوانين المخالفة للدستور ، لذا فإن ذاتية احكامه وصفاتها تمايزت عما سواها من الاحكام القضائية ، وامتازت عليها بخصائص العموم والالزام المطلق والبتات النهائي ؛ من هنا تقايست تلك الاحكام مع القواعد القانونية التي تسن بخصائص العموم والتجريد حتى باتت تنشر بالجريدة الرسمية ذاتها وأصبحت لا تقبل المطاعن التمييزية كونها مقترنة بقرينة

  Breach of the promise to contract and the penalty resulting from this breach is one of the important topics that occupied a wide space of interest in civil law jurisprudence when studying the subject of the promise to contract, and this importance did not disappear from the mind of the judiciary, so it was present in its decisions. This importance is due to the specificity of the promise to contract, despite being a contract Like other contracts, the breach of it is characterized by a special nature, as it may take place before the stage of expressing the desire on the part of the one who is promised, and it may be after expressing that desire. Based on this importance, the penalty for breaching the contract promise will be the su

Of the new concepts introduced by the decree of the amendment of the French Civil Code No. 131-2016 issued on 10 February 2016, which raised a debate in jurisprudence both at the level of French jurisprudence or the Arab, the concept of (the content of the contract), which seems to have emerged from the appearance of new legal articles ( 1162-1171) is the cornerstone of the contract and the contract in the contract, the two pillars which, over the course of 200 years and a half, have been one of the main pillars of the codification of Napoleon. Is that the decree of amendment has already abandoned these two pillars, or most of what he did is a change in terminology while preserving the content of these two pillars implicitly, this is what w

After the Napoleonic Code of 1804 came without any legal rules specific to the duration of the contract, and was content to refer to it in scattered legal texts, Legislative Decree No. 2016-131 came to establish a comprehensive legal system for the duration of the contract, starting from the period of its formation, through the period of its implementation, and ending with its continuation after the expiration of its term, in the third section of the fourth chapter related to the effects of the contract (Articles 1210 - 1215), relying on judicial precedents on the one hand - which are many, as will be shown through the research pages - and contractual practices on the other hand. Perhaps the main motive that prompted the French legislator t

Legislation under study organized the judicial control over the decisions of the end of service heads of administrative units in Iraq,  since before the first amendment to the law of the governorates in the irregular province No. (21) for the year 2008 was the appeal before the Federal Supreme Court and after the first amendment became the decision to dismiss the governor and the governor The Governing Law stipulates that the Governor may appeal against his dismissal before the Administrative Judicial Court within fifteen days from the date of his notification. The law obliges the court to rule on the judgment with in (30) days The law did not provide for the governorates in force to appeal the dismissal decision،  and the law

This research addresses the commentary on the appeal’s ruling of the Dubai Court of Cassation No. (501) Personal Status law of 2021 issued on 12 January, 2022, which is related to the application of foreign law before the Emirate judge. This ruling raised several legal principles and problems that require clarification and attention due to their importance. This is the first ruling on the application of the legislative amendment introduced by the UAE legislator to Article 1 (3) of the Personal Status Law No. (28) of 2005 by Federal Decree Law No. (29) of 2020. According to thereto, the application of foreign law before the Emirate judge is contingent on the adherence of one of the litigants by applying it in accordance with the attribu

The unconstitutionality of the Oil and Gas Law inTthe Kurdistan Region No. (22) of 2007