Is no longer a football player looks to sport as a means of entertainment and physical development. But become see as part of The economic and is getting in return for the effort of، Through a contract with a club to organize the activity which is called a contract of professional, This contract is similar to the rest of the contracts in terms of problems and dispute that arise during the implementation or after it ends because of the nature of sports to such disputes and privacy being subject to special rules (regulations, national and international professional) required that subject to judicial bodies private mission confined settle sports disputes these entities and is affiliated unions legal committees and the court of arbitration for

Sort out the stability of the principle of separation of power to stabilize the rules for the distribution of power to the three state authorities (legislative, executive and Judicial), this, in turn led to emergence of the principle of legislative unilateralism, which means that the legislative authority is unique and not the other by exercising legislative competence, except with the permission of the legislative or the provisions of the constitution, this led to the emergence of what is known as the traditional relationship between law and regulation. However, this principle began to lose it, severity due the political, social and economic condition which changed the relationship between the law and the regulation, consequently, the l

The right of jurisdiction is one of the legal systems related to the guarantee, which aims to give the creditor a position that favors him over other creditors. Jurisdiction in bona fide is a consequential real right over the real estate subject of jurisdiction, enabling him to collect his right ahead of all other ordinary creditors and owners of ancillary real rights, from the price of the real estate or any money that replaces it, and in whatever hands it is.

The right of jurisdiction, like the ancillary rights in rem, provides confidence to the creditor through his jurisdiction with a special guarantee that encourages him to grant credit to the debtor, by giving him a sufficient period for fulfillment, which is reflected in th

      The plea of ​​lack of jurisdiction is the most important formal defense in the administrative judiciary, it is a denial of the court’s authority in hearing the case for its deviation from the limits of the jurisdiction that the law has decided for it, and if that court issues a decision in pleading not to have jurisdiction directed at it, the matter does not deviate from one of two decisions, it is either to decide that it is She is competent to hear the case, so she refuses the payment and proceeds to examine the matter, or she decides to accept the defense of lack of jurisdiction raised by the litigants, or on her own if the matter is related to the public order, and she must here refer the case to

The implementation of the rule of hardship brings facilitation requires several conditions that must be observed in order for the provisions to turn from difficulty to ease for the taxpayer, whether those conditions are related to hardship necessitating facilitation or conditions related to the person charged with hardship. Knowing this issue is extremely important, especially with regard to hardships that were not mentioned in terms of control or specification.

The constitution  occupies the highest rank in the legislative hierarchy, as its rules are considered the highest rules in the entire legal system, and accordingly it follows that the competent authority in legislation respects the constitution and does not violate it, and in other words, the legislation that is issued by it should be constitutional, i. Modern constitutional documents in many countries have organized the issue of creating oversight over the work of those authorities, and this oversight may be judicial when it is exercised by the judiciary, and it may be non-judicial when entrusted to other bodies, and judicial oversight is achieved through an original lawsuit filed to challenge the A law or regulation before a Supre

      It is recognized, that the constitutional text is the binding rule for all persons of the state, whether rulers or ruled, with all the contents of the constitutional texts, and thus the three authorities; Legislative, judicial, and executive are bound by the content of these texts, as it is not possible for any of these authorities to confer their own visions and perceptions on the constitutional text, so it is necessary to return to the will of the constitutional founder, in order to clarify the meaning that he seeks by placing that text. This includes the content of Article (93/Third) of the Constitution of Iraq for the year 2005, which referred to the disputes that the Federal Supreme Court is competent

The Supreme Federal Court of Iraq was established by the Federal Supreme Court Law No. (30) For the year 2005 on the basis of the provisions of the Iraqi State Administration Law for the transitional period of 2004. The law included a clear reference to the main purpose for which the Federal Supreme Court was established, the separation of jurisdictions between different levels of government, as well as its competence to control the constitutionality of laws. It was also referred to in the Constitution of 2005 and defined its powers in Article (93) of it, in addition to the other terms of reference in the other articles of the Constitution and the laws in force, and from reading the texts of the above Constitution, the Federal Supreme Co

The contracts in restraint of trade are considered as void contracts according to the English common law, that is to say, they are prima facie void. Because their voidness is presumed and based upon a rebuttable presumption that these contracts are contrary to the public policy in principle. Owing to the unreasonableness of the  Restraint of Trade conditions or terms in which they are included. But if it is proved that they satisfy the requirements of reasonableness, in accordance with the contracting parties, and both the temporal and spatial extent of their coming into effect, as well as the public interest. The court will validate them. It is also worth-bearing in mind that this type of contracts fall under contracts void at comm

This study seeks to clarify the adequacy of the current legal texts - procedural and objective - to respond to our situation under Corona and whether it needs to modify or develop treatment for this general exceptional circumstance or to avoid it, and the appropriateness of the idea of force majeure or emergency circumstance or (the idea of foreign reason) to face the consequences or effects of Corona on the rules of litigation and the formation of the court and its jurisdiction and procedural appointments and litigation procedures and appeal and judgment and its implementation in order to maintain and implement the public order that interferes with the mechanisms and measures taken It is intended and has legal and judicial implications