The Court of Cassation is a court of law that monitors the lower courts by reviewing the judgments and decisions issued by these courts, and the fact that their control is on the side of the legal to judge the penal. It monitors the commitment of the courts' compliance with the proper and formal rules of law. In some cases, are errors chop terms and criminal to the facts of the case are subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Cassation and not to the Court of Cassation, except to the extent that they cause the provisions through which the Court of Cassation can impose control over the facts of the criminal case and the outcome of the Court topic The subject of the results, and thus the legal aspect of the criminal case is the place t

The Criminal Order System is a special procedural system that represents a form of (a non-pleading convention), which is intended to confront a particular type of crime in order to put an end to the expiry of the lawsuit resulting from it in a simple and easy manner that does not observe the rules prescribed for ordinary trials. The basic idea in the system of criminal orders is that the case papers in simple crimes contain enough evidence to decide on them without the need to proceed in the normal way of pleading, confronting and hearing witnesses ... etc.

Criminal mediation is one of the new means that seeks to resolve criminal disputes away from the traditional procedures of criminal cases and outside the court, but under his supervision and supervision, the mediation process is based on the consensual idea of ​​ending the conflict as it gives both the offender and the victim a role in resolving the next conflict between them Outside the judiciary, with the intervention of a third party from the third party (the mediator), who has the main role in the success of the mediation process, and the mediator is obligated to inform the judicial authority of the results of the mediation, and then the judicial authority later has discretion in the return report, otherwise You will either go th

The trial stage is one of the important stages in the criminal case, which aims to assess the weight of the evidence, whether it is in the interest of the accused or against his interest. When the subject court presents the evaluation of the evidence, it presents it in terms of its value in proof. Therefore, the trial procedures guarantee to the litigants, especially the accused, many guarantees, including the right to defense and to express the requests that the legislator allowed them to make, and the judge is not bound by the requests of the litigants. He is free to deny the evidence and is not obligated to include in the reasons for his ruling all the evidence that was presented during the session. Rather, he is only obligated to sta

The constitutional judiciary has played an important role in promoting the separation of authorities in modern regimes. Their constitutions stipulated that there should be a separation of authorities so that each authority can exercise its functions in a manner that does not contradict the work of other authorities. Constitutional justice through the decisions issued by the constitutional judiciary through which the limits of its work is established and the introduction of the principle of separation of authorities from the elements of the legal state and also leads to the protection of the rights of individuals from any abuse may be issued by any authority.

And at the same time contributes to the process of the transfer of autho

The international community has  sought to establish a judicial institution that works to apply the law fairly، as a result of a necessity dictated by the circumstances of the international community، and Because of the great violations against humanity in times of peace and war، and in order to establish the parameters of international criminal justice between all societies and countries، this necessity resulted in the idea of ​​establishing an international criminal court . A court that enjoys independence and impartiality  exercising  its international jurisdiction according to legal procedures to suo any one  accused of committing an international crime in to inflict Penalties against him or her، whether

The idea of ​​danger is of particular importance in the design of modern criminal Politics, especially in relation to places that are at the core of the principles of criminal legislation, which are the extent of its importance and its connection to crime and its physical structure in all its components.

             Most criminal legislation takes the danger of a Basis and a criminalization code, reflecting the criminal legislator's keenness to provide greater protection for the fundamental interests of the society. This protection is important and necessary, since it is often possible to wait for the harmful consequences of unlawful conduct.

  &nb

The legislators in (France, Egypt and Syria) set controls for filing an administrative lawsuit, including the signature of the lawsuit petition by a lawyer accepted before the court, and the lawyer is committed to performing his work in accordance with the conditions of the State Council and the practice of the legal profession. And if the goal of the legislator is to achieve the public and private interest represented in observing the law and assisting the plaintiff legally, then this condition sometimes leads to individuals refraining from resorting to the judiciary because of the financial cost of registration fees and lawyers, which prompted the legislator, especially the French, to exempt several lawsuits from this condition, includ

The methods of appealing penal judgments are: it is the permission established for the parties to the case to show the defects of the ruling issued in it, and the request to the competent court to cancel it or amend it in a way that removes from its defects. Penal legislation differed in the possibility of appealing penal judgments; The Iraqi penal legislator has taken a different path in the methods of appealing penal judgments other than the path taken by most comparative penal legislation. After the advent of the Code of Criminal Procedure No. 23 of (1971), and based on the provisions relating to the methods of appeal in the aforementioned law, we find that It is distinguished from the comparative legislation by the following:

      تعد تقنية العقلنة ^([i]) تقنية تطويرية للنظام البرلماني تعمل على معالجة الانحرافات التي يمكن ان تحدث لهذا النظام سواء بفعل النظرية او نتيجة للممارسة السياسية، ولعل اول من تحدث بموضوع (البرلمانية المعقلنة) الفقيه الدستوري الروسي الاصل (بوريس ميركن) في فترة مابين الحربين العالميتين (الاولى والثانية) واراد بها تقوية مركز الحكومة لمواجهة البرلمان، وقد اخذ بها واضعوا الق