The constitution  occupies the highest rank in the legislative hierarchy, as its rules are considered the highest rules in the entire legal system, and accordingly it follows that the competent authority in legislation respects the constitution and does not violate it, and in other words, the legislation that is issued by it should be constitutional, i. Modern constitutional documents in many countries have organized the issue of creating oversight over the work of those authorities, and this oversight may be judicial when it is exercised by the judiciary, and it may be non-judicial when entrusted to other bodies, and judicial oversight is achieved through an original lawsuit filed to challenge the A law or regulation before a Supre

      It is recognized, that the constitutional text is the binding rule for all persons of the state, whether rulers or ruled, with all the contents of the constitutional texts, and thus the three authorities; Legislative, judicial, and executive are bound by the content of these texts, as it is not possible for any of these authorities to confer their own visions and perceptions on the constitutional text, so it is necessary to return to the will of the constitutional founder, in order to clarify the meaning that he seeks by placing that text. This includes the content of Article (93/Third) of the Constitution of Iraq for the year 2005, which referred to the disputes that the Federal Supreme Court is competent

       اصدرت المحكمة الاتحادية العليا قرارها المرقم (48/اتحادية /2021) في 6/6/2021 والمتضمن تقرير اختصاص المحكمة الاتحادية العليا الاستثنائي بتفسير التشريعات سواء كان التفسير بمناسبة الفصل بمنازعه معروضه امامها للفصل بدستورية نص او تشريع، او بناء على طلب اصلي بالتفسير من احد السلطات الاتحادية، ووفق ضوابط محددة ذكرتها في قرارها

This Research Deals With The Public and Private Aspects of Constitutional Reform in Iraq, and its focuses on The Organic and Substantive aspects of The Federal Supreme Court by harmonizing The Constitutional Texts with The Provisions of the Federal Supreme Court Law No. 30 of 2005 on the one hand, The constitutional and legal system currently existing with the practice of the Federal Supreme Court and the draft law of the Federal Supreme Court, the purpose of which is to achieve genuine constitutional reform that guarantees us the establishment of a constitutional institution capable of advancing its constitutional competencies according to the legal idea To the rule established by the drafters of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq

The Supreme Federal Court of Iraq was established by the Federal Supreme Court Law No. (30) For the year 2005 on the basis of the provisions of the Iraqi State Administration Law for the transitional period of 2004. The law included a clear reference to the main purpose for which the Federal Supreme Court was established, the separation of jurisdictions between different levels of government, as well as its competence to control the constitutionality of laws. It was also referred to in the Constitution of 2005 and defined its powers in Article (93) of it, in addition to the other terms of reference in the other articles of the Constitution and the laws in force, and from reading the texts of the above Constitution, the Federal Supreme Co

The constitutional judiciary has played an important role in promoting the separation of authorities in modern regimes. Their constitutions stipulated that there should be a separation of authorities so that each authority can exercise its functions in a manner that does not contradict the work of other authorities. Constitutional justice through the decisions issued by the constitutional judiciary through which the limits of its work is established and the introduction of the principle of separation of authorities from the elements of the legal state and also leads to the protection of the rights of individuals from any abuse may be issued by any authority.

And at the same time contributes to the process of the transfer of autho

     أصدرت المحكمة الاتحادية العليا قرارها التفسيري المرقم 122/اتحادية/2022 في 29/5/2022 الذي جاء فيه (ان الية استجواب مسؤولي الهيئات المستقلة تكون بذات الالية التي يتم فيها استجواب الوزراء استناداً لاحكام المادة (61/ثامناً/هـ) من الدستور وبنتيجة الاستجواب يمتلك مجلس النواب صلاحية اعفائهم بالأغلبية المطلقة دون سحب الثقة عنهم، لان الثقة تمنح من قبله للوزراء، فاذا ما تم تعيينهم بموافقة مجلس النواب او أي سلطة

العدول عن الاحكام في القضاء الدستوري ظاهرة قضائية مستقرة في معظم المحاكم العليا ، والسبب يرجع الى ما تتمتع به هذه احكام هذه المحاكم من حجية مطلقة ترجع الى كونها غير قابلة للطعن بطرق الطعن القضائية المعروفة على مستوى القضاء العادي ، والمحكمة الاتحادية العليا في رغم حداثة تشكليها نسبياً الى انها اخذت بما انتهى اليه القضاء الدستوري في العالم ومنه الاخذ بمبدأ العدول القضائي استجابة للمتغيرات السياسية والاقتص

The unconstitutionality of the Oil and Gas Law inTthe Kurdistan Region No. (22) of 2007

       This research deals with the work of administrative protection (civil defense), which is vested in the authority of administrative control, and the latter directly related to public freedoms, as the maintenance of public order from various disasters and damage usually requires restriction

In the area of ​​protection of population and property, the administration is forced to put restrictions on some public freedoms in particular, as the administrative protection aims to protect the security of citizens from the risks and the safety of their property, and the prevention of harmful residues that may arise from its exercise. (Civil Defense) Take a set of measures to reduce disasters and damag