The Article will examine the position of Hate Speech in international criminal law, within two sections: the first one shed light on the linguistic and terminological concept of term of Hate Speech, as well as looks at hate speech effects in scope of the periods of war and peace.

The second section will focus on Hate Speech and whether occupied to the ranks of abnormal and criminal behaviors, in the two sub-sections: first looks at the legal qualification (the level of national and regional efforts), while the second will search on International Criminal Courts Jurisprudences, so as to answer the following question: what is the reason of differences treatment of Hate Speech in Statutes of International Criminal Courts? Why some o

We had, in this research, the scope of Authentic provisions of the International Criminal Court, where divided by the two sections: the first, outlining the concept of Authentic provisions of the International Criminal Court, as we dealt with the definition in the Authentic res judicata where the conditions matter, and the scope of Authentic provisions of the International Criminal Court in terms of the parties and time and place.

The second section, we have considered the appeal against the provisions of the International Criminal Court, where we explained the challenge the provisions of the International Criminal Court to appeal and cassation, as well as the revision of the provisions of the International Criminal Court.

   This research is entitled "International criminal Responsibility for terrorist crimes". Individuals bear the international criminal responsibility for supporting terrorist crimes, whatever their status, whether they are ordinary persons, heads of state or state officials. They could be prosecuting through national or international courts. Although terrorist crimes are not mentioned in the Statute of the International Criminal Court, terrorist groups may be prosecuting before the International Criminal Court when they commit international crimes within the jurisdiction under the Statute of this court, i.e., genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes. Leaders and officials of States that support terr

يتناول البحث الموقف في العراق، وما يتصل بذلك من جرائم دولية مرتكبة

في الأقليم العراقي، ومدى أختصاص المحاكم العراقية الوطنية بنظر تلك الجرائم

ومحاسبة المسؤولين عنها، وبيان أختصاص المحكمة الجنائية الدولية، والدور

الذي يمكن أن تضطلع به في سبيل تحقيق العدالة.

تسلم مكتب المدعي العام ماينيف عن ) 404 ( جهات اتصال تخص الوضع

في العراق وهذه الشكاوى وردت من مواطنين ومنظمات تعبر عن قلقهم حيال

ا

In contest of the serious crimes committed by the gangs of the terrorist, it was necessary to shed light on how to prevent their impunity. Therefore, this research came to examine the composition of these gangs, their nature and source of funding, and then the nature of the crimes committed by them, and if their crimes fall in the International criminal law or only within the framework of the Iraqi criminal law, after that we were able to find out the nature of those crimes and thus the best mechanisms that represent the just punishment that these gangs deserve as a punishment for the crimes they committed against the unarmed civilians.

The termination of the international sales contract is one of the solutions that the parties and the law resort to resolve some fundamental violations that occur in the contract for any reason, but determining the fundamental reason that leads to the termination of the contract is the most extreme type of treatment of the fundamental violation that has been interpreted differently by international experts, whether courts international bodies or international arbitration committees. And in relation to the difficulty of determining the fundamental violation that leads to the termination of the contract and the exceptions contained in cases that are considered a fundamental violation and that are not considered a fundamental violation, the

The ICC is a reclining judicial body that punishes ordinary persons for crimes committed and falls within its jurisdiction in accordance with article (5) of the Court's Statute: crimes of extermination, war, aggression, and crimes against humanity. This gives the international community the right as affected by these acts to initiate criminal proceedings to punish the perpetrator. However, this right has not been left so and without regulation, but has been enshrined in the Rome Statute - whether with regard to those who are qualified to exercise this right, or with the restrictions to which it responds, requiring the ICC to exercise its powers to take some previous actions in contact with the Court in connection with the case, the most

The international community has  sought to establish a judicial institution that works to apply the law fairly، as a result of a necessity dictated by the circumstances of the international community، and Because of the great violations against humanity in times of peace and war، and in order to establish the parameters of international criminal justice between all societies and countries، this necessity resulted in the idea of ​​establishing an international criminal court . A court that enjoys independence and impartiality  exercising  its international jurisdiction according to legal procedures to suo any one  accused of committing an international crime in to inflict Penalties against him or her، whether

The mechanism of managing religious difference

God is the Lord of the worlds, forget them and their jinn, Arabs and non-Muslims, He is the Lord of Muslims and Lord of non-Muslims, as He created them male and female despite their differences in tongues and colors, so He created them according to their diversity and distinction in beliefs and religions.

 To prevent flare-ups due to differences, the Lord of the worlds set limits that he has forbidden to cross, and draw clear maps as mechanisms for managing religious differences and lifting psychological barriers between the different, so that they can coexist in peace and freedom, each adhering to his faith, and practicing the rituals of his religion.

The policy of criminalization in private criminal laws focuses primarily on acts that violate social order, which constitute an attack on interests deserving of criminal protection. This policy is distinguished by its own nature, which stems from the nature of criminalization in these laws, In addition to the law issued by the legislative authority, there are certain cases in which the executive authority has the authority to issue regulations and instructions that are the source of criminalization and punishment in these laws, This policy in private criminal law is based on the criminalization criteria in these laws. The criminal legislator takes the criminality of the nature of the interest, which is often of a changing nature, and the