In this paper, we investigate prime near – rings with two sided α-n-derivations
satisfying certain differential identities. Consequently, some well-known results
have been generalized. Moreover, an example proving the necessity of the primness
hypothesis is given.
In this paper, the concept of Jordan triple higher -homomorphisms on prime
rings is introduced. A result of Herstein is extended on this concept from the ring into the prime ring . We prove that every Jordan triple higher -homomorphism of ring into prime ring is either triple higher -homomorphism or triple higher -anti-homomorphism of into .
In this paper, we proved that if R is a prime ring, U be a nonzero Lie ideal of R , d be a nonzero (?,?)-derivation of R. Then if Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either or U is commutative Also, we assumed that Uis a ring to prove that: (i) If Ua?Z(R) (or aU?Z(R)) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (ii) If ad(U)=0 (or d(U)a=0) for a?R, then either a=0 or U is commutative. (iii) If d is a homomorphism on U such that ad(U) ?Z(R)(or d(U)a?Z(R), then a=0 or U is commutative.
Let R be a 2-torision free prime ring and ?, ?? Aut(R). Furthermore, G: R×R?R is a symmetric generalized (?, ?)-Biderivation associated with a nonzero (?, ?)-Biderivation D. In this paper some certain identities are presented satisfying by the traces of G and D on an ideal of R which forces R to be commutative
In this paper, we introduce the concepts of higher reverse left (resp.right) centralizer, Jordan higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer, and Jordan triple higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer of G-rings. We prove that every Jordan higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer of a 2-torsion free prime G-ring M is a higher reverse left (resp. right) centralizer of M.
We introduced the nomenclature of orthogonal G -m-derivations and orthogonal generalized G -m-derivations in semi-prime G -near-rings and provide a few essentials and enough provision for generalized G -n-derivations in semi-prime G -near-rings by orthogonal.
Ring theory is one of the influential branches of abstract algebra. In this field, many algebraic problems have been considered by mathematical researchers who are working in this field. However, some new concepts have been created and developed to present some algebraic structures with their properties. Rings with derivations have been studied fifty years ago, especially the relationships between the derivations and the structure of a ring. By using the notatin of derivation, many results have been obtained in the literature with different types of derivations. In this paper, the concept of the derivation theory of a ring has been considered. This study presented the definition of
Ring theory is one of the influ
... Show MoreIn this study, we prove that let N be a fixed positive integer and R be a semiprime -ring with extended centroid . Suppose that additive maps such that is onto, satisfy one of the following conditions belong to Г-N- generalized strong commutativity preserving for short; (Γ-N-GSCP) on R belong to Г-N-anti-generalized strong commutativity preserving for short; (Γ-N-AGSCP) Then there exists an element and additive maps such that is of the form and when condition (i) is satisfied, and when condition (ii) is satisfied
In this paper we show the nilpotency of nilpotent derivation of simeprime Γ-ring with characteristic 2 must be a power of 2 and we show the nilpotency of a nilpotent derivation of simeprime Γ-ring is either odd or a power of 2 without torsion condition.
In this paper, we will prove the following theorem, Let R be a ring with 1 having
a reverse derivation d ≠ 0 such that, for each x R, either d(x) = 0 or d(x) is
invertible in R, then R must be one of the following: (i) a division ring D, (ii) D 2 ,
the ring of 2×2 matrices over D, (iii) D[x]/(x ) 2
where char D = 2, d (D) = 0 and
d(x) = 1 + ax for some a in the center Z of D. Furthermore, if 2R ≠ 0 then R = D 2 is
possible if and only if D does not contain all quadratic extensions of Z, the center of
D.
this paper, we will prove the following theorem, Let R be a ring with 1 having
a reverse derivation d ≠ 0 such that, for each x R, either d(x) = 0 or d(x) is
invertible in R, then R must be one of the following: (i) a division ring D, (ii) D 2 ,
the ring of 2×2 matrices over D, (iii) D[x]/(x ) 2
where char D = 2, d (D) = 0 and
d(x) = 1 + ax for some a in the center Z of D. Furthermore, if 2R ≠ 0 then R = D 2 is
possible if and only if D does not contain all quadratic extensions of Z, the center of
D.