Let R be an associative ring. The essential purpose of the present paper is to introduce the concept of generalized commuting mapping of R. Let U be a non-empty subset of R, a mapping   : R  R is called a generalized commuting mapping on U if there exist a mapping :R R such that =0, holds for all U. Some results concerning the new concept are presented.

An -module is called absolutely self neat if whenever is a map from a maximal left ideal of , with kernel in the filter is generated by the set of annihilator left ideals of elements in into , then is extendable to a map from into . The concept is analogous to the absolute self purity, while it properly generalizes quasi injectivity and absolute neatness and retains some of their properties. Certain types of rings are characterized using this concept. For example, a ring is left max-hereditary if and only if the homomorphic image of any absolutely neat -module is absolutely self neat, and is semisimple if and only if all -modules are absolutely self neat.

Let R be a prime ring and δ a right (σ,τ)-derivation on R. In the present paper we will prove the following results:
First, suppose that R is a prime ring and I a non-zero ideal of R if δ acts as a homomorphism on I then δ=0 on R, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on I then either δ=0 on R or R is commutative.
Second, suppose that R is 2-torsion-free prime ring and J a non-zero Jordan ideal and a subring of R, if δ acts as a homomorphism on J then δ=0 on J, and if δ acts an anti- homomorphism on J then either δ=0 on J or J
Z(R).

In this paper, we investigate prime near – rings with two sided α-n-derivations
satisfying certain differential identities. Consequently, some well-known results
have been generalized. Moreover, an example proving the necessity of the primness
hypothesis is given.

      This paper investigates the concept (α, β) derivation on semiring and extend a few results of this map on prime semiring. We establish the commutativity of prime semiring and investigate when (α, β) derivation becomes zero.

Let R be a commutative ring with identity, and let M be a unity R-module. M is called a bounded R-module provided that there exists an element x?M such that annR(M) = annR(x). As a generalization of this concept, a concept of semi-bounded module has been introduced as follows: M is called a semi-bounded if there exists an element x?M such that . In this paper, some properties and characterizations of semi-bounded modules are given. Also, various basic results about semi-bounded modules are considered. Moreover, some relations between semi-bounded modules and other types of modules are considered.

    In this paper, we formulate and study a new property, namely indeterminacy (neutrosophic) of the hollow module. We mean indeterminacy hollow module is neutrosophic hollow module B (shortly Ne(B)) such that it is not possible to specify the conditions for satisfying it.  Some concepts have been studied and introduced, for instance, the indeterminacy local module, indeterminacy divisible module, indeterminacy indecomposable module and indeterminacy hollow-lifting module. Also, we investigate that if Ne(B) is an indeterminacy divisible module with no indeterminacy zero divisors, then any indeterminacy submodule Ne(K) of Ne(B) is an indeterminacy hollow module. Further, we study the relationship between the indeterminacy of hollow an

The purpose of this paper is to prove the following result: Let R be a 2-torsion free ring and T: R?R an additive mapping such that T is left (right) Jordan ?-centralizers on R. Then T is a left (right) ?-centralizer of R, if one of the following conditions hold (i) R is a semiprime ring has a commutator which is not a zero divisor . (ii) R is a non commutative prime ring . (iii) R is a commutative semiprime ring, where ? be surjective endomorphism of R . It is also proved that if T(x?y)=T(x)??(y)=?(x)?T(y) for all x, y ? R and ?-centralizers of R coincide under same condition and ?(Z(R)) = Z(R) .

Let R be a commutative ring with unity. Let W be an R-module, for K≤F, where F is a submodule of W and K is said to be R-annihilator coessential submodule of F in W (briefly R-a-coessential) if  (denoted by K  F in W). An R-module W is called strongly hollow -R-annihilator -lifting module (briefly, strongly hollow-R-a-lifting), if for every submodule F of W with  hollow, there exists a fully invariant direct summand K of W such that K  F in W. An R - module W is called strongly R - annihilator - ( hollow - lifting ) module ( briefly strongly R - a - ( hollow - lifting ) module ), if for every submodule F of W with   R - a - hollow, there exists a fully invariant direct summand K o

      The concept of semi-essential semimodule has been studied by many researchers.

     In this paper, we will develop these results by setting appropriate conditions, and defining new properties, relating to our concept, for example (fully prime semimodule, fully essential semimodule and semi-complement subsemimodule) such that: if for each subsemimodule of -semimodule  is prime, then  is fully prime. If every semi-essential subsemimodule of -semimodule  is essential then  is fully essential. Finally, a prime subsemimodule  of  is called semi-relative intersection complement (briefly, semi-complement) of subsemimodule  in , if , and whenever  with  is a prime subsemimodule in , , then .  Furthermore, some res